Movie Review

姓名：吴萌 学号：201222456 Last Sunday,we saw a movie in the classroom.The film is a couple of karamer social ethics. Film reflects in American society is a common problem: family and marriage problems. Personal ideal career and family life, the contradiction between the couple in the conflict and family tragedy. In the film, director of the deep meaning of gender relations, and how to realize how to adjust how women should defend oneself independent character and pursuit of life as well as the significance, this is the meaning of the film.In the meantime, "a couple kramer on in artistic is also high achievement. The biggest characteristic is true, with performance. Film tightly abide character relationships, emotion as the clue, affection to impress the audience. Men are used to be considered as the bread hunter of each family. By the same token to Ted. Ted received a big customer, if he succeed ,the boss would add his shares of the company and promote him as the next creative director. However, Success can not stop the failure of marriage . He was just such a hard working person that he couldn't realize his family conflicts had been so serious that his wife decided to leave him as well as her beloved son. Through trial and error, he finally could build a life together with his son Billy. What's more, the stereotypes of our

society have forced us to think that man is naturally not a better parent than woman. But we can see that, Ted had proved that was wrong, and he eventually found that the loving relationship between Billy and him would be unshakable and eternal.

Joanna was the symbol to all of the housewives. Her behaviors had best demonstrated a woman's protest for being neglected as a person with no right to live an independent life. After Leaving a year, She came back to compete for his son's custody. So the couple had to go to court . Finally, Joanna won. However, she gave up custody of the children. Because she had seen that her husband is no longer the only know to make money workaholic. Being a good parent, it has to do with constancy, patience, listening, confidence as well as love. His husband Ted made it. In the end, She chose to give up. Sometimes, give up is more. Nowadays, many wives no longer spend all their time in housekeeping as well as baby sitting. Not only would they struggle to find their own identity in the society, but also build their career lives.

In my poor opinion, all the family members should talk to confide what have happened and what they think in their mind, which is a best way to maintain our family relationship.

第二篇：《史密斯夫妇》观后感

《史密斯夫妇》观后感

去看了《史密斯夫妇》，单从意境上，国内给翻译成《史密斯行动》就大错而特错，这突现出自诩为“精英”“文化人”的某些电影从业者是多么没文化：本片尽管是动作片，但精神的实质并在于此，实际上还是说的是家庭问题。原文直译就是史密斯夫妇，但国内却故意画蛇添足成了个行动。实在是有够无聊。

废话说完，说正题。

如前所说，这部影片本质上是家庭问题片，只不过是用极端的形式包装了出来。人之生于这个社会，总是带着假面具，为了利益而生存，虽父母兄弟也难逃于此，而夫妻本是上帝将一个人分了两半，而这两人费了力气，就是为了重新在一起。我以为，所谓爱情，就是能够放下自己的面具，以最无戒备的心躺在自己的爱人腿上，诉说自己的痛苦，接受她的抚摸。若两人做爱的同时还要担心对方偷袭自己，这样的生活哪比死了的好！

片中的两人问题是比较极端的，因为他们的工作比较特殊。不过，原理相同。夫妻间有些自己的秘密固然正常，但生活的大部分都这么做就变的非常可怕，比如象影片中吃饭，同时还要注意对方的叉子，是否有毒，说话的时候还要用谈判审问技巧套出对方和不被对方套出。单是说谈话——现在的有些夫妻是否也这样呢？

累不累啊。

父母终究会离开自己，兄弟姐妹也未必与自己同心，只有夫妻才是真正可以信赖的对方，结果有些人连夫妻之间的生活还不放过，还要带上面具，还要提防、猜疑乃至欺骗和攫取。那和一个人生活有什么区别呢？难道真的孤独的提防人，被提防这样的生活才是最爱的吗？

当你全力攫取的时候，你丢失的东西可能更多。可惜这个道理许多人都不懂。