《简爱》 文/胡永博

《简爱》读后感

看了《简爱》思绪万千，激情澎湃，我总会被里面的每一个情节，每一句话深深打动，曾和张哥说过，张哥说：“可能简爱里有我的影子，我才如此热衷，很多时候我们都是因为书里面有我们自己的影子而热衷于那本书。”如：他爱《平凡的世界》中的孙少平，《红与黑》中的于连。我冥想，果真有我的影子吗？也许有一点点，可是自己和简比起来，终是没她优秀，也没她理智和坚强的。好几次想写《简爱》读后感的，只恐自己才疏学浅，道不尽其中的韵味，只能记其一二，留作纪念。

《简爱》是夏洛蒂.勃朗特以充满激情的笔法，塑造了简爱这样一个谦谨、坚强而有独立精神的形象。简爱幼年父母双亡，寄人篱下，饱受欺凌；后来又进了孤儿院受尽折磨。她贫穷矮小，貌不惊人，但她凭着一颗坚强高尚的心灵，自尊自立。她与罗切斯特的爱真诚炽热，又坚决建立在平等的基础上。最后历经种种磨难，终于获得真诚珍贵的爱情。

看过的爱情小说很多，也总痴情与别人的故事，但唯独《简爱》让我百看不厌，爱不释手，每次翻开总会激情满满，思绪万千。简爱勇敢、独立、坚强、外表朴素却心思绵密，机智、敏锐，每一个眼神都具有穿透力、洞察人的内心。貌似平静，但内心深处有着十分绚烂而甜蜜的幻想，有着火样的热情与如水的柔情。 简爱一直以来都是我的偶像，当我身处逆境时，深受挫折时，我总会想起她，想起那个简爱：他告诉我无论经历什么，无论遇

《简爱》 文/胡永博 到了什么，都不要放弃自己，不要对生活失去希望，即使在痛苦中也要努力，努力让自己向上，认真地生活。

印象中有一段是这样的：罗切斯特装成一个巫婆，对简爱说：“你冷，你不舒服，且很蠢，你冷是因为你孤孤单单一个人，你不舒服是因为多少甜蜜以及美好的东西都与你无缘，你蠢是因为你明知道有一份幸福在等着你 你却不愿向他靠近一步”罗切斯特用心细致地观察发现了简爱当时的处境和简爱的所思，所想。罗切斯特也是让我很喜欢的男主人公，若没有他对简爱细致，用心地爱，也成全不了他们那么刻骨铭心的爱。

当简爱想到阻隔在她和她主人之间那条很深，很宽的鸿沟--------财富，地位，世俗时，她的眼泪再也不听她的意志，夺眶而出，当罗切斯特说：“有时候我有一种奇怪的感觉-----尤其像你现在在我身边时。仿佛我左肋下的哪个地方有一根弦与你那小身躯里同样的地方一根同样的弦打成了结，纠缠得紧紧的，解也解不开，一旦我们分开，我真怕这两根纠缠着的弦套被绷断，那时候我会紧张不安，我的心会痛得流血。而你呢------你会把我抛在一边，忘得干干净净吧？”??后来简爱反驳说：我一定得离开，你以为我会留下来，成为你眼中一个可有可无的人吗？你以为我是一架机器——一架冷漠无感情的机器吗?你以为我能受得了别人把我仅有的一片面包从我口里夺走，把仅有的一滴救命之水从我杯里泼掉吗？你以为，因为我贫穷、卑微、矮小、不美，我就没有灵魂，没有心了吗？——你错了，我也有和你一样

《简爱》 文/胡永博 的灵魂，和你一样的一颗心！如果上帝曾给我一点儿美丽、丰富财产，我也会让你感到难以离开我，就像我现在难以离开你一样。我现在是用我的心灵和你的心灵对话，站在上帝面前，我们是平等的。我被深深震撼：简的感情是多么丰富而又理智。当我们深爱一个人时，很多时候，为了怕失去，我们委屈自己，不敢说出心里的话，甚至忍受自己在他眼中是一个可有可无的人，简爱不能忍受，在我的感情世界里我也不允许自己忍受别人不在乎我，假如不在乎，我宁愿自己像简爱样，即使心里痛苦，绝望也要逼自己离开。纵使我不美丽，贫穷，卑微，但我也是有自尊的，我也渴望平等。

再后来，当简爱怀着悲伤，受尽折磨离开逼自己离开罗切斯特后，安理说她应该伤感，消沉，颓废，因为他的精神支柱，她的所有甜蜜的梦都幻为空。如安娜、卡列宁娜卧轨自杀了，因为她输不起，害怕面对，可是唯独简爱没有。她怀着一颗隐痛的心，即使夜深时她会为自己把自己从罗的依恋中强行拉开的命运而哭泣，但当白天到来时，她依旧热爱生活，努力向上，甚至比任何人都能吃苦，都勤奋。

简从一开始，就注定活在现实的孤独之中，这使她懂得拥有和珍惜，使她知道亲情 友情和爱情的重要性，她对这些的渴望是她在孤独生活中表现出的最强烈的愿望,为了这些她甚至压制 住了自己的主见和理智，但最终她还是从这些中摆脱了出来，选择了自己的生活，是呀，人有权挑选自己喜欢的布景。

《简爱》 文/胡永博 不知为何，我深深地爱着简爱，爱着她身上所有的美好品质。我也深爱罗切斯特，只有他才能给简爱那么美，那么细致，那么动人心魄的爱。所有的爱情小说里，我唯独看见简爱不是悲剧，这让我心里有些许欣慰，也让我相信生活是美好的，爱情也是美好的。

第二篇：简爱读后感英文版-我读简爱-英语论文

简爱读后感英文版-我读简爱-英语论文

Oliver Twist, one of the most famous works of Charles Dickens', is a novel reflecting the tragic fact of the life in Britain in 18th century.

The author who himself was born in a poor family wrote this novel in his twenties with a view to reveal the ugly masks of those cruel criminals and to expose the horror and violence hidden underneath the narrow and dirty streets in London.

The hero of this novel was Oliver Twist, an orphan, who was thrown into a world full of poverty and crime. He suffered enormous pain, such as hunger, thirst, beating and abuse. While reading the tragic experiences of the little Oliver, I was shocked by his sufferings. I felt for the poor boy, but at the same time I detested the evil Fagin and the brutal Bill. To my relief, as was written in all the best stories, the goodness eventually conquered devil and Oliver lived a happy life in the end. One of the plots that attracted me most is that after the theft, little Oliver was allowed to recover in the kind care of Mrs. Maylie and Rose and began a new life. He went for walks with them, or Rose read to him, and he worked hard at his lessons. He felt as if he had left behind forever the world of crime and hardship and poverty.

How can such a little boy who had already suffered oppressive affliction remain pure in body and mind? The reason is the nature of goodness. I think it is the most important information implied in the novel by Dickens-he believed that goodness could conquer every difficulty. Although I don't think goodness is omnipotent, yet I do believe that those who are kind-hearted live more happily than those who are evil-minded.

For me, the nature of goodness is one of the most necessary character for a person. Goodness is to humans what water is to fish. He who is without goodness is an utterly worthless person. On the contrary, as the famous saying goes, 'The fragrance always stays in the hand that gives the rose', he who is with goodness undoubtedly is a happy and useful person. People receiving his help are grateful to him and he also gets gratified from what he has done, and thus he can do good to both the people he has helped and himself.

To my disappointment, nowadays some people seem to doubt the existence of the goodness in humanity. They look down on people's honesty and kindness, thinking it foolish of people to be warm-hearted. As a result, they show no sympathy to those who are in trouble and seldom offer to help others. On the other hand, they attach importance to money and benefit. In their opinion, money is the only real object while emotions and morality are nihility. If they cannot get profit from showing their 'kindness', they draw back when others are faced with trouble and even hit a man when he is down. They are one of the sorts that I really detest.

Francis Bacon said in his essay, 'Goodness, of all virtues and dignities of the mind, is the greatest, being the character of the Deity, and without it, man is a busy, mischievous, wretched thing, no better than a kind of vermin.'

That is to say a person without goodness is destined to lose everything. Therefore, I, a kind

person, want to tell those 'vermin-to-be'to learn from the kind Oliver and regain the nature of goodness.