精钢不锈钢厂诉福地房地产开发公司买卖合同纠纷案

精钢不锈钢厂，注册地：江苏省泰州市兴化市开发区1号，法定代表人刘远，厂长

福地房地产开发公司，注册地：江苏省泰州市兴化市开发区150号，法定代表人安定德，总经理

兴化市精钢不锈钢厂与福地房地产开发公司于20xx年6月1日达成协议：由兴化市精钢不锈钢厂为福地房地产开发公司制作三万副钢窗，合同对产品的质料、规格、单价都做了相关规定，并约定的于20xx年7月15日前交付货款。合同签订之日以及合同签订后10日内福地房地产开发公司共向精钢不锈钢厂交付货款250万元整。20xx年7月10日，兴化市精钢不锈钢厂按合同规定的期限向福地房地产开发公司全部交货，并经福地房地产开发公司验收合格。20xx年7月15日，福地房地产开发公司检查产品时，发现有31件产品有重度变形、破损情况,123件产品有轻中度变形情况，但不能举证产品质量问题是出现在交货前。20xx年7月15日到20xx年8月1日，精钢不锈钢厂向福地房地产开发公司多次所要剩余500万元货款未果。福地房地产开发公司向精钢不锈钢厂要求退有质量问题的产品，双方协商未果。同时，福地房地产开发公司以遭受金融危机为由请求精钢不锈钢厂准许其推迟交付货款，未得到精钢不锈钢厂的同意。经查明，产品出现质量问题出现于产品交付之后，是由于福地房地产开发公司工作人员工作失误所致。金融危机不是违约责任中的免责事由，不能作为福地房地长开发公司拖欠债款的理由。至20xx年8月1日精钢不锈钢厂起诉至泰州市兴化市人民法院，福地房地长开发公司交付剩余500万元货款，也未支付违约金。

第二篇：律师常用英文信函样式：案情法律分析报告

案情法律分析报告

September 12, 2005

TO: All foreign and domestic summer interns

FROM: Director of Litigation

RE: Theory of the Case Memorandum

A theory of the case is a working hypothesis of how the law and facts will fit together to support the result sought by our client. The statement of facts should include, in addition to a statement of those facts presently known, a statement of those facts that need to be

developed. The statement of law is a summary explanation of why specific legal authorities compel a decision in our client’s favor on the basis of those facts. Although it is to be stated in detailed and definite terms, the theory of the case is necessarily provisional, and may be revised and refined as fact development proceeds.

In writing the theory of the case memo, you must begin with one or more overarching

statements of what we will ask the court to hold. For example, in an age discrimination in employment case, an overarching statement of the plaintiff’s case theory might be:

The defendant employer is liable under the Labor Act for damages,

injunctive relief, and attorney’s fees for having terminated our client because

of his age. Our client will make out a prima facie case based on the facts

that he was in a protected age category at the time of his termination, was

qualified to perform the job, was replaced by a younger person, and was

terminated in a work force reduction that disproportionally impacted persons

over 40 years old. Defendant’s effort to establish that our client was

unqualified to perform the assigned work will fail to rebut the prima facie

case.

Next, each element of the case theory must be identified. Any legal principles that affect an element of the case theory must be briefly analyzed. Known facts that support an element of the case theory must be stated and facts that need to be developed must be identified.

In the preceding age discrimination example, this analysis would be as follows:

1. Element: A showing of disparate impact alone establishes a prima facie case of age

discrimination.

2. Analysis: In Feihong Group vs. Fort Motors (China), Ltd., the Supreme People’s Court

held that disparate impact alone establishes a prima facie case of race discrimination, because it raises a permissive inference with regard to protected class. The same

analysis should apply in age discrimination cases, because of congressional intent to create a protected class.

3. Known facts: 12 of 20 persons terminated in plaintiff’s department were over 40 years

old.

4. Facts to be developed: age distribution of defendant’s overall work force reduction and

remaining work force.