1.开场:good afternoon ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the debate today,
2.介绍正反方:on my left sits the government and right the opposition, today they will debate the issue “辩题”,and the government believes that “正方观点” the opposition believes that “反方观点”
3.开始:now we shall start the debate
First let us welcome the prime minister of the government, you will have 7 mins to speak.
正方一辩结束we have heard your opinions Prime Minister ,thank you very much and now let us welcome the leader of the opposition , you are also given 7 mins to speak.
这个发言的顺序是 正一 反一 正二 反二 正一 反一 正二 反二
其中 正一是Prime Minister 正二是 Deputy Prime Minister 反一是leader of the opposition 反二是 deputy leader of opposition
每人7分钟结束之后 大家都要有一个结束语 什么谢谢你的辩论、你变现很好之类的, 但是语言要简练 明了 清晰。
4.整场结束:till now we have heard all of your arguments and opinions, thanks for your excellent performance and please wait a second for the judges to announce the result of the debate.
大家要讲的大致内容以及程序就是这些,现场大家可以自由发挥,这两天大家可以上网搜一些视频来看,学习一些语言。过程中大家要求注意自己的语音语调,精神状态要好,不可有懈怠。最好穿正装,没有的话 也要很正式。希望大家能出色完成任务,大家可以积累一些经验,明年参赛。
主席人员教室分配是:202 李泽旭 203 刘欣 204 杨杰威 101 陶佳李 102 于家琛 103 摘雪微 104 王赵悦 105 金迪 106 黄聆轩 108 张亚男
我把赛制给大家以便于大家熟悉,有什么不懂的可以给我回复邮件询问。
大赛章程:
比赛形式:分为初赛、复赛、决赛三个阶段
1.初赛:39支辩论队抽签决定对阵时间和地点(赛前培训时进行抽签),通过比赛,胜出20
支队伍。这胜出的20支队伍,立即进行抽签决定对阵情况,再进行二次比赛。从这20支队伍中取胜出的10支队伍,进入复赛。
2.复赛:10支辩论队抽签决定对阵情况(抽签安排在第二次培训时进行),通过比赛,胜出
5支队伍。这胜出的5支队伍,加上失败的队伍中得分最高的那支队伍(这样总共6支队伍),立即进行抽签决定对阵情况,再进行二次比赛。胜出的3支队伍,加上失败的队伍中得分最高的那支队伍,即前四强,进入决赛。
3.决赛:最后两支队伍进行最终PK,决出冠军队。
选手发言顺序:每位选手都应按以下顺序进行发言:
发言计时
每位辩手的发言的时间均为7分钟。辩手提出“质询”的时间应在第2到第6分钟之
间。“质询”是指在对方发言时,针对发言者正在申述的论点提出的本方观点。发言计时从辩手开始说话为始;所有必要内容(包括说明、介绍等)都在计时范围内。
两名机动工作人员将在以下时间点向选手示意(此处均由工作人员举牌示意):
时间标示:
时间标示:
第一分钟末 响铃一次(允许开始提出”质询”)
第六分钟末 响铃一次(提出”质询”的时间结束)
第七分钟末7:00 连续响铃两次(发言时间结束)
超时15秒之后7:15 连续响铃(发言缓冲时间结束)
在连续两次响铃结束后辩手有15秒”缓冲”时间,在这段时间内允许选手总结已出具
论点。”缓冲”时间内不允许出具新论据,在”缓冲”时间内提出的新论据可以被裁判判为无效。在”缓冲”时间后仍继续发言的辩手将被裁判团扣分。
辩手角色分配
每个选手都有一个定位,每一个发言都有其特殊目的。下面列出的辩手角色描述具有借
鉴作用,并非必须完全遵循。根据不同的辩论形式,辩手有时需要在完成本角色需要说明的部分之外,还要表述其它方面的观点,在正方支持辩题、反方驳斥辩题的基础上,发言结构仍需满足其它论证的需要。
选手 角色及职责
“正方领袖”
(正方二辩) 辩手应该驳斥反方领袖的发言,并进一步加强“首相”提出的。
“反方第二领袖”
(反方二辩) 辩手应支持他/她的队友,答复对方辩手提出的疑问并且在驳论中添加新论点。
正方成员
(正方一辩) 辩手应该通过引入一个延展案例来支持正方开篇陈述队伍的立场。一个有力的延展案例应该提出一个与正方一、二辩完全不同的自己
的理论,同时此理论也对其产生支持。正方成员也可以反驳反方领
袖提出的观点。
“反方成员”
(反方一辩) 辩手应该支持反方一、二辩手的立场,并且必须引入新的延展。与正方辩手一样,反方辩手独特的延展案例应与反方一、二辩手提出
的完全不同,但同时仍然在大方向上与他/她们的观点一致。反方
辩手同样也可以直接或间接地反驳正方辩手的论述。
“正方总结”
(正方二辩) 辩手应该总结正方的论述和反方的反驳,除非是要反驳反方辩手的论述,否则正方总结不应再提出新的立论点。
“反方总结”
(反方二辩)
辩手应该总结反方的延展案例并且对整场辩论中每支辩论队的立场做出回应。反方总结不能提出新的立论点。
辩题
辩题将在辩论开始之前15分钟,在全部辩手参加的公开集会上公布,每轮的辩题都不相
同。辩题的内容集中在时事和长期无定论的问题上,辩题不会意义模糊或有多重含义。
辩论的重点和内容
英国议会制辩论中,正方辩手应提供辩题为真的原因,同时反方辩手提供辩题为假或正方辩手提出的辩护无法论证辩题为真的原因。双方都有责任通过直接或间接的方式反驳对方辩手提出的辩论。
若辩题持中立态度,辩手——尤其是正方一队的辩手——应该尊重辩题的原意,并将辩论的中心集中在辩题的原意之上。正方一队诠释辩题的意义时,不应试图歪曲辩题原意。正方一队一辩有责任在开篇陈述中给具有特殊意义的词汇下定义。
在大多数实战中,正方一队对辩题的解释将会成为整场辩论的基础。如果开篇陈述没能明确阐释辩论的重点,或者完全误读了辩题,反方一队可以提出对辩题的重新定义。除了两方的一队一辩之外,其它辩手不能再次改变辩题中任何词汇的定义。
准备
所有赛场的辩论都将在辩题公布后的15分钟时开始。辩手可以在这15分钟的准备时间内从纸媒资料中获取信息。预先准备的纸媒资料在辩论中可以使用。
在准备时间内辩手可以与本队辩友及一位来自辩手所在大学的老师进行讨论。辩手不能在准备时间内与其他任何人(包括其他队伍的教练、辩手,教导人员,裁判等)进行讨论。 正方一队有权在辩论场地讨论,其它所有辩论队必须分别在不同场所讨论。
辩手必须在辩论开始前5分钟进入辩论场地,未能在规定时间内到达场地的辩论队,是否被剥夺参赛权利,将视裁判长裁决而定。
质询(POI)
选手可以在辩论的第一分钟末至第六分钟末期间的任意时间口头提问或起身要求质询,被提问的辩手可以接受或回绝质询。如果接受质询,提问辩手有15秒时间提出异议或提出问题。质询和回答时间记在被提问辩手的发言时间中。提问与回答双方辩手对质询的把握能力,将会被列入裁判裁定辩论队优劣及单个辩手评分范围内。而质询的次数以及优先度不计入评分范围。
第二篇:英语辩论赛反方一辩开场词
OK. Thanks my fellow debater. Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen.We are glad that the definition we made about corpse donation is similar with fellow debaters’. However, I can’t agree with debaters’ opinion.We insist that upon death, each person’s body should not be given to the State for scientific use, or for organ transplant. According to this topic, what is"should be given"? Is it a forced obligation? Donation has the firstly basic principle is voluntary. And what is the voluntary principle? It refers to the dead and his family donate the corpse with voluntary.If lack of voluntary,it is not the "donation" but robbery. The followings are the reasons for our opposition.
First of all, we approval that corpse donation can really meet the needs of scientific use or organ transplant .Especially for part people who require organ to transplant to save their lives, but how much is this part? In China,the current medical system is not perfect, and cost of the transplant operation is so high even more than 30,000. Besides,after operation, medicine also spent a amount of overhead. All of cost goes beyond the ability to pay for a general family .
Secondly, both people and the State do not have right to violate the value with another one. Forced corpse donation on the surface is to defend the patient's right to survival, but meanwhile it destroys the right the dead and his families to choose freely.
In addition,the deceased's body belongs to himself, although he died ,the right to process the corpse should be given to the deceased’s successor.That is a performance of inherited relationship. However enforced donation undoubtedly breaks the inherited system. The reason why the donation is forced is that the organ is rare and so many patients need it.Similarly,money is also need
urgently,should people donate their heritage to the State? Obviously say NO! They are all voluntary donations.Without will of the parties,the donation would become robbery.If we can not control our body,where are the human rights?If we can not dominate our money freely, what is the necessity of wills? Is it a wastepaper? The State makes the law to give us rights to protect ourselves from
infringement .But he prevents us to use our rights?Where is the equity? Why we can’t freely make our decisions?Who can give you the rights to robber our body without our consent?
Finally, please debaters explain to us how can the State deal with these people who don’t want to donate their bodies? Directly forced occupying without any comments? Are there not any other more moderate ways get the same effect? What is “should be given”?That is to say,people’s corpse must be given to the State after his death,no matter whether he is willing or not.Then,where are our rights?So we insist that upon death ,each person’s body should not be given to the State for scientific use or organ donation. Thank you .
Yes ! The value of others lives is quite precious, but personal belief does not have signification? Chinese traditional belief is that "your body is something you receive from your parents”.Even death, leaving the whole body is not just only a formality,but it represents our respect for human rights, and respect for the deceased.