160多个国家出现了类似占领华尔街运动给我们带来的启示
综合英国《每日邮报》等媒体报道，美国民众发起“占领华尔街”运动三个星期以来，蔓延到了全美国上千座大小城市，气势不断扩大，5日延烧到首都华盛顿。同时，示威民众计划于15日发起全球大串联，将此次抗议浪潮席卷到全世界。目前，英国、澳大利亚、加拿大等地均已有组织者开始筹备，脸谱网（facebook）上的响应人数也越来越多。
“占领华尔街”系列运动被称为“美国之春”或“美国之秋”，意味美国人的“觉醒运动”。然而，一些政治分析家并不看好，称这场运动无组织无目标难成气候。
“占领华盛顿”抗议运动10日进入第5天，超过美国警方允许的4天期限，由于抗议者据“法”力争，美国警方一再推迟最后期限，并于当天傍晚出人意料地允许抗议者在白宫与国会山之间的自由广场继续抗议四个月。
加拿大首次商讨“占领”
据加拿大《环球邮报》9日报道，7日，受到“占领华尔街”运动的启发，多伦多的一些青年人也组织起来，举行集会来商讨抗议活动。
这次抗议活动的组织者们在多伦多市中心彻奇街和威灵顿大道附近的伯克扎公园举行首次集会。参加集会的有大约250人，大多都是年轻人，也有一些老人。集会没有定下具体的示威地点，而是主要讨论“占领”行动的细节，例如该如何供应示威群众饮食、保证“士气”，以及安全问题，一些人还提到了应该避免警方像G20峰会时大规模逮捕示威者。
组织者还透露，多伦多的“占领”行动和美国华尔街类似，抗议者会在多伦多金融区旁边公园扎下帐篷，此外还将在街道旁静坐举标语示威。
澳大利亚近三千人计划露营
据美国媒体10日报道，现在，许多澳大利亚人通过社交网站脸谱网，自发组织策划从8日开始在墨尔本举行类似的抗议活动，以此响应万里之外依然“坚守”在华尔街的抗议示威者。
这个名为“占领墨尔本”的团体一出现，便受到很多澳大利亚网友的热捧，到6日就有1300多人表示要直接参与此次抗议活动。截至目前，这一团体的成员已近3000人。据了解，此次“占领墨尔本”抗议活动将于15日在墨尔本市中心的城市广场举行，抗议者计划在此宿营几天到几个星期。
英国欲攻占伦敦证交所
据英国《每日邮报》10日报道，9日，在英国首都伦敦，抗议政府提出的医疗改革方案的集会者阻断市中心的威斯敏斯特桥。同时，还有抗议者计划向伦敦金融城的伦敦证券交易所进攻，社交网站脸谱网上一个名为“占领伦敦证交所”的小组正受到越来越多人的关注。
9日，约2000名抗议者和国家医疗服务系统雇员上街游行，呼吁上议院拒绝政府关于国家医疗服务系统的改革计划，甚至有不少人卧倒在威斯敏斯特大桥上，一度阻断大桥的交通。
与此同时，“占领伦敦证券交易所”拥有6000多名追随者。活动人士计划从10月15日下午4时到12月12日占领伦敦金融区的帕特诺斯特广场，目前已有200余人在网上确认参加。
启示:
此次运动迅速演进的根本原因在于美国民众对现状极度不满。金融危机在政府的救助下虽得以控制，但经济危机却因此愈演愈烈。颇具讽刺意味的是，美国各大股指指标不错，说明大资本家仍在挣钱，但民众却饱受无就业、无希望、无办法之苦。眼见两党之间要政治不要经济、奥巴马变革之志未成"改变"之实，群众只得依靠自己的力量寻求"改变"。如果这场运动能换来两党妥协、共同变革，未尝不是好事，但似乎两党政客利用这一事件的心态大于彼此反省的愿望，这便为危机进一步升级埋下了隐患。果真如此的话，由金融危机演变成全面体制性危机的风险，将成为美国需要真正重视的问题。
虽然，我国的专家学者对此点评，几乎都认为占领华尔街的游行示威，不会对美国的经济、政治带来大的影响，因为美国的“民主制度”比较完善，特别是相当多的“中产阶层”，尽管也受到经济不景气的冲击，但是，他们是不会要求改变美国的经济、政治状态的。因此，这些专家学者认为占领华尔街的游行示威不会有什么结果。他们的一个理由，就是至今，占领华尔街的示威者还没有一个比较一致的诉求，示威者的要求“五花八门”。
但是，我认为，无论这次占领华尔街的游行示威结果如何，这一行动，已经表明了美国人民的觉醒，可以说，这是敲响了美国资本主义制度的丧钟！这再一次证明了，马克思主义的胜利！
无数事实早已说明，马克思主义并没有因为社会主义在苏联和东欧遭到“剧变”而“销声匿迹”，恰恰相反，苏联解体和东欧剧变，完全证明了马克思主义的真理性——让整个世界结束人剥削人的资本主义，进入人人平等的社会主义，这一历史巨变，绝不是一朝一夕的，而是相当长的历史发展过程！
如今，资本主义世界的不合理制度，终于自食恶果——这就同资本主义的周期性经济危机一样，只不过是以不同于历史上经济危机的形式出现的。今天的金融危机，与过去的经济危机本质是一样的，都是资本主义的剥削制度造成的，而且此次更突出了金融寡头和剥削阶级政府的贪婪与无耻！
我坚信，美国的占领华尔街游行示威，无论结局如何，都深刻的揭开了美国资本主义制度华丽欺人的盖子——1%的人，占有99%的社会财富！而这，不正是马克思主义所阐述的吗？。
占领华尔街运动有很多诉求，但最核心的是贫富分化和反对华尔街的贪婪。
中国政府开始是有点幸灾乐祸的，但他很快醒悟过来，于是新闻媒体模糊并最终屏蔽了这方面的信息，原因很简单，占领华尔街的诉求在中国更强烈，中国面临的问题比美国还要严重。
中国政府的精英们研究了次贷危机和占领华尔街，并达成了共识，从政策上我们看到了改变：
1，金融体系必须为实体经济服务，和实体经济相匹配。美国的金融体系占美国经济的比重从5%扩大到病态的40%，金融产业的扩大其实只是吹大了房地产和股市，当泡沫破灭的那一天，灾难总是落在广大的人民身上。我们看到房产的限购令，有效的限制了房地产泡沫，对股市的泡沫也带有深深的戒心，股市6000点的自由落体就是股市大泡沫的崩溃，如果当初就不吹大他，那么广大股民也不会有那么大的损失。财富应当从实业中去求取。
2，以人为本，关注民生，缩小贫富差距。中国金融行业，电信，石油等垄断行业的年薪在20万以上【还有恐怖的年终奖】，而中国低端制造业的年薪2万左右，最低工资标准是1000左右。中国的制造业收入差距有20倍，如果算算人口最多的广大农业今年刚好年收入上了5000元，那么行业差距是恐怖的。今后中国应该给劳动密集型企业更多的减税，给农业更多的补贴。显然政府认识到了这一点，并在积极推进。两桶油一面拿财政补贴，一面是员工二三十万的高薪，还卑鄙的叫亏损，天理何在？应当给垄断行业定个最高薪资标准，减小贫富差距。
3，稳健的货币政策。4万亿的投资从哪里来，印钞机，放松信贷而已。通货膨胀是国家对全民的财富抢劫。特别对广大的社会底层伤害更大，如果吃饭都面临危机，那么社会大动荡就会随之而来。德国二三十年代的恶性通货膨胀直接导致了希特勒上台。二战后的德国政府严格控制通货膨胀，定为国策，在此次金融危机中德国一枝独秀。中国也应当把控制通货膨胀定为永久不变的国策，国家的健康发展才能久远。这一点，希望对权利使用毫无限制的的中国政府保持足够警醒，如果中国再折腾一两次，后果不堪设想。
4，中国不能搞高福利。西方的高福利压垮了很多国家，但中国目前的任务是补课，中国是没福利，特别是广大农民。政府应当把农民纳入福利体系，搞低福利，多在提供就业机会上做功夫。
占领华尔街还有对美国资本主义制度的反思，资本主义还可以分为金融资本主义，权贵资本主义，福利资本主义等。中国的资本主义到底走向何方，值得中国政府的精英们认真的思索。当然政府会说我们不是资本主义，我们是社会主义，中国人民表示理解。
首先，必须遏制贫富悬殊扩大的趋势，这对于亚洲新兴市场体国家是非常现实的警示，特别是世界人口第一大国中国。其次，对于金融业的监管一定要跟上。管好货币投放，防止通胀；管好汇率，防止热钱入侵；管好金融秩序，防止过度投机炒作和高利贷蔓延；特别是管好金融高管们的薪酬
第二篇：华尔街占领运动
99%vs1%？
——占领华尔街运动解读
1 the-Interpretation on the” occupy Wall Street “movement 20xx年9月。"
2 On September 17, 2011, the United States ’Constitution Day, with the call of " the People's an New York ",which was made up of by social activists, artists and students ,thousands of people gathered in Wall Street to protest against the high unemployment, poverty and wealth disparity; protest against financial oligarchy of the Wall Street and the disaster they brought to the American people ; protest against the government's appeasement and tolerance to them, required to support labor’s unions, increase budget in the health insurance and social security system. An old man in the parade said: We have had an American dream: if you have an education and work hard ,you’ll have a decent life, but now the American dream have been broken .3 in U.S., the rich 1% of the people has 99% of the wealth of our country. we 99% of people pay taxes, but no one truly represent us .the Washington politicians only serve 1% of the people." – said A demonstrators ,"
33 Protesters in the Occupy Wall Street movement aiso say big business has too much political influence. They argue that greed and self-interest have gotten in the way of democracy. Twenty-nine-year-old Damien Nichols joined an Occupy Baltimore camp at a state park in Maryland. He studied politics and government in college, and says the Occupy movement wants to "reboot democracy.". Since then they have spread around the country, to other cities, to college campuses, and to other countries.
44 things seems too bad . In October the Congressional Budget Office released a report on trends in the way income is spread throughout the population. Members of Congress requested the study as part of their debate over how to improve the economy and reduce the nation's debt.The report shows how the income gap, the division between the rich and the poor, has widened. It covers the period from nineteen seventy-nine to two thousand seven. This is what it says about the top one percent of earners: During that period their average income -- after taxes and adjusted for inflation -- grew by two hundred seventy-five percent. Compared to other Americans, their share of the nation's income more than doubled. In nineteen seventy-nine the top one percent received eight percent of all after-tax household income. By two thousand seven that share had grown to seventeen percent.
At the same time, there was a drop in the share received by the lowest twenty percent of earners. The lowest fifth of the population received about five percent of all after-tax household income in two thousand seven. That was down from seven percent in nineteen seventy-nine
55 The nation's unemployment rate has remained around nine percent for months The U.S. labor department announced the non-agricultural unemployment rate remain at 9.1%,while the real unemployment will be higher .The official unemployment rate of The youth between 19 and years old is 18.4%,and the black’ was 27%.in augest the number of new jobs was zero.in the five years,the number of the unemployed whose unemployment time is more than six months have increased rapidly from more than one million to more than five million . the
misery index( whichis made up by the rate of price inflation and the rate of the unemployment) made by yale University economist is the highest in the twenty eight years。the misery index was 55.3 in the late 2008，in augest in 2008 the misery index again reach 55.7 。The common people never feel so bad in nearly 30 years,
66 The "Occupy" protests around the United States have provided another opportunity for the Democratic and Republican parties to voice their differences. To the dismay of the protesters, both parties show signs of trying to sway public sentiment about the demonstrations in their favor.At first, Republicans were dismissive. But then the Republican presidential candidates, such as Herman Cain, began blaming the protests on President Barack Obama. "This is a distraction from the failed policies of the Obama administration," said Cain.Political ,analysts say that strategy aims to energize voters and refocus anger into traditional Republican themes such as bloated government."The one effective line that I think they will continue to use is that those protesters should turn their sights not so much on Wall Street, but right down to the White House," noted John Fortier with the Bipartisan Policy Center. Protesters like Ron Sanger say they expect the news media and politicians to distort their message. "They keep denying or not addressing the real issues," said Sanger. "And these little sound bite thing. It's not going to sell. People are getting smarter than that. And that is why we are here."
77 Democrats were quick to sympathize with the demonstrators. Political analysts say party leaders see some themes they hope will lure voters, like higher taxes for the rich. Ruy Teixeira is with The Center for American Progress."So, I think they want to try and take advantage of it and it will fit nicely into a lot of the themes that President Obama is trying to develop for his campaign," said Teixeira. President Obama hopes to get re-elected. His public approval ratings have suffered, while those for Congress have fallen to historic lows. BARACK OBAMA said: "Obviously I've heard of it. I've seen it on television. I think it expresses the frustrations that the American people feel, that we had the biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression, huge collateral damage all throughout the country, all across Main Street, and yet you're still seeing some of the same folks who acted irresponsibly trying to fight efforts to crack down on abusive practices that got us into this problem in the first place. So, yes, I think people are frustrated, and the protestors are giving voice to a more broad-based frustration about how our financial system works .Mr. Obama has been asking Americans to be patient with his efforts to speed economic recovery.he said: "It is going to take time to rebuild an economy that restores security for the middle class, renews opportunity for folks trying to reach the middle class. It is going to take time to rebuild an economy that is not based on outsourcing or tax loopholes or risky financial deals, but one that is built to last."
88 But the protesters object. They are angry with President Obama on a number of issues, such as the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and his treatment of Wall Street bankers. Vera Spohr voted for Obama, but is unhappy."He has always been owned by the money. He still is. Sure, he will take whatever he can from us and use it his way. But he is not going to make any substantive changes," said Spohr .The protesters say they seek no political endorsements and will ignore the political spin. They plan to
press on with their message: that they are the 99 percent of the population calling for economic justice.
99 Bob Costello is an information technology consultant with the Federal Reserve Bank. He says the activists should be calling on Congress to limit the influence of companies in Washington.BOB COSTELLO: "They want to express the anger, but there's no way to satisfy that anger. Personally, I think they ought to be in Washington in front of Congress going 'Maybe we should get our congressman to get the companies out of their pockets.' Because that's what this is about, right?"
99 apparently, the financial crisis lead to the bitter fruit. However, the social movements are not isolated ,but closely related with the macro-structural changes of the society. In fact, the problems of today ’s American society has a lot with the Reagan administration's neo-liberal policies and financial liberalization in 1980s . These policies lead to changes in American society, class relations and further in social structure, eventually result in today's predicament.
10 The crime of neo-liberalism
the media and scholars hold a wide variety of views and interpretations on the cause of the 2008 financial crisis. However, most of them only dates back to conflicts and adjustment of the "new economy" in 1990s ,does not study the political - economic periodic motion in a longer period, and also ignores the changes in class relationship and civil society which are closely related to today’s plight .in fact Financial crisis has never been a purely economic issue; it is also associated with the differentiation and combination of political power, the changes in class relationship .In 1980 Ronald Reagan defeated President Jimmy Carter belonged to democratic party.This remarked the end of "civil rights" era leaded by the Democratic Party's in 1970s ,after which had witnessed painful adjustments, and it also means the collapse of political compromise between the elite and the major social class after the world war2 . Since then, Reagan opened a new cycle leaded by the Republican party, .
11 In nearly 30 years From 1980 to the financial crisis in 2008s, the United States, most domestic policy-making is basically dominated by the the Republican Party
. the Democratic Party also have a short-term political victory, such as Bill Clinton who was the representative of the Democratic Party come to power from 1992 to 1998, but his policies and ideas were largely limited by the political framework of Republican party. After the 1993 midterm elections, Democrats lost both the House and Senate majority, and Clinton also suffered a "Waterloo in the national health insurance reform which he had been preparing since the his election campaign .
12 The so-called Republican Party’s policies, is simply the so-called "neo-liberal" policies, the policy paradigm includes the following main aspects: advocate the market economy system and concept of competition to replace the post-war policy of state ’s intervention; relax controls to industry; substantially cut tax, slash public expenses; financial liberalization, abolish a series of restrictions to financial trade. This series of policy during the Clinton’s administration in 1990s is only slightly
adjusted. The gratifying development of the new economic, seems to prove the success of neo-liberal policies. the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act further Loosened controls to finance in 1999. Even George W. Bush who represent Republican Party take power, he have not changed much in politics and economic. The neo-liberal policies in the last 30 years lead to two important consequences, directly led to the current U.S. predicament.
13 Structural changes in the U.S. elite
First, significant adjustments have emerged, in the ruling group :the financial elite replace the post-war industrial elite to fully grasp the power ; national elite further exclude the local elite, monopolized political and economic power.
。 In 50s-60s in the last century, the U.S. financial industry and real economy are deeply rooted in local political - economic networks. Except a few large national banks, a variety of local banks are very well developed. Banks, especially local bank's primary business is to provide loans to enterprises and support the development of industrial capital. Both in nation and local level, financial elite and industrial elite become a community of interests through the complex links between banks and The board of directors of the enterprise
14 However, the decline of the United States ’ strength 1970s, the hit of two oil crisis, the continued economic downturn, stagflation and the pressure of foreign competition, make the industry - financial alliance soon fell apart.
15 In 1980s, with the development and expansion of the neo-liberal policies, many financial industry controls and restrictions were canceled and the antitrust laws are substantial lax. The banking First, set off a massive merger movement, and in the latter half of the 1980s reached its climax. Only In 1987, the United States 7 large-scale bank mergers and acquisitions took place and; in it is 8.as a consequence, local banks which is the main finance to support the development of industry, most have been replaced by the national bank. On the other hand, the real economy also set off a wave of mergers.After a lot of mergers and acquisitions in Telecommunications, utilities, retail, media, agriculture and energy industries, etc. since 1980s lots of national diversified companies come into being.
16 This restructuring of the economic structure, make a rapid decline in the number of local companies ,so they can not keep their influence in local politics - economy network, the United States directly attribute to the decline of the manufacturing industry’s.competitiveness
17 Afterwards, ,as technological progress slow down,the core competitiveness decline and other various reasons, the average profit margins of the major American industry , has been far less than that of the post-war era. Accordingly, the business profit of traditional banks to provide credit support for the industry come to a standstill .Soonly, the financial industry focus on investing business and trade of financial derivatives ,to pursue higher profits.
18 At the same time, fundamental changes have taken place in merger wave of the real economy compared with 1960s. The latter are mostly of vertical integration merger to unify Industrial Chain, while the former instead rely on leveraged buyouts, and its purpose is not to improve economic efficiency, but to resale assets
at a higher prices. Thus, large national financial institutions, plays a more important role in mergers and acquisitions in industry, especially those investment bank which specialize in leveraged buyouts in Wall Street
19 This trend continued in the next 20 years, making the financial elite further beat the industrial elite.in 1990s the new economy driven by the development of Internet, in essence, is a redistribution of wealth directed by the Wall Street financial elite engaged in investment business,;after the IT bubble burst, the U.S. economy can achieve "soft landing", to a large extent ,the reason is that Wall Street financiers have found a new tool: the sub-prime financial products and its derivative products. The financial will inevitably lead to even the whole world monopoly of capital.
20 So,after 1980s, the U.S. national elite which was led by the Wall Stree replaced the previous dominant local elite. This structural change can be found from what profession the Ivy graduates choose . These elitist graduates’ most favorite career is often doctors, lawyers, business management, may also include university professors in 1960s; but from 1980s, Wall Street has become the only choice.
21 another important consequence of the Neo-liberal policies is that different social classes’ political compromise come to an end in post-war time .the middle class and the bottom’ status in economic and political declined. On the one hand, the industrial elite lost their previous position.and the political program that they shared economic interests with workers and other classes have been unable to maintain., in order to maintain the operation of the entire system, the new elite represented by The financial elite and multinational executives have to sacrifice other class’ interests in the name of market and efficiency
22 Neo-liberal policies in taxation was in favor of obviously the mass affluent. After a variety of operations of tax avoidance, the actual tax burden of the mass affluent is very low,. Ronald Reagan tighten policy after he took office, and the unemployment rate was closely 10%. the economic situation is better, when Clinton take power, and the unemployment rate declined, but later rised . Obama is now faced with the situation that the rate of unemployment is 9.1% . The real wages of workers after a rapid growth after the war, haven’t grown much in nearly 30 years.what’s more, Reagan also lowered the nation's minimum hourly wage, during the reign of George W. Bush it further goes down,reach its lowest level. These have greatly influenced the distribution of wealth in American society. the Gini index of the U.S. increased from the 1980s ,after 2000 it is more than 0.4, while the index in most developed countries remained between 02.-0.3.
23 On the other hand, as the public functions retreat and shrink, countries are unable to protect the vulnerable groups who are ignored by the market. The U.S. Social security network Shrinked,and the social welfare programs have been cut down ., this make the bottom of society in desperation even as early as 2008. As Many public policy institutions can not be canceled in a short term ,Reagan largely cut down their budgets, reduce a large number of staff ,so many policies can not be implemented. This later became the evidence that the state’s intervention and public policy is of ineffectiveness.
24 So, as the national elite replace the local political - economic elite network
which represent the interests of the cross-class, and has long maintained the stability and prosperity of the community, the U.S. government can no longer continue to contribute to various social classes’ union and political compromise . Therefore, the financial elite and Republican ‘s political - economic program, is a program that set aside the other class, a program leading to the fracture of class relationship. But the American civil society, has been very active, in addition to markets and countries there is a strong social sphere, why in the recent 30 years, the social movements in civil society can not effectively prevent the expansion of the financial elite and the neo-liberal policies and, until recently the movement break out? This is related with the fact that the American civil society and social movements has changes a lot since the late 1960s
25 ？Why the common people can not resist the financial elite?
the upsurge of the social movements In The 1960s brought some unexpected results. First,the large-scale gender and racial equality movement greatly impact the method of the long-term civil society organization: the form of the community-based, race_baised and gender-baised organizations., after"progressive era", most social organizations have been cross-gender and inter-racial,and the cohesion has been greatly reduced.
26 On the other hand, with the development of television and mass media, , great changes have taken place in the fundraising way of civil organizations,- TV ads and mailers began to replace the activities of grass-roots organization and become the main channel. As the way of fund-raising had Changed, the local basis of these civil society organizations began to shrink, the functions of the headquarters established in cities began to continuously expand, professional managers with an MBA began to replace the grass-roots leaders and become the organization's leaders. This adjustment in organization and personnel is in order to better attract the middle class and the rich’s contributions, rather than represent the interests of the common people. The appeal and issue of the Social organization itself also will be subject to the change. In order to attract public attention in a number of advertisings,for contributions, many social organizations started advertising some specific issues, such as the protection of certain rare animals, a sort of children's diseases, and so on. Gradually, only the sensational and the specific issues in order to attract those middle-class who have no time to participate in social movements, but occasionally would like to offer some love.
27 Furthermore, the major issues and general social issues related to the general public, such as the protection of labor rights and the improvement of the circumstances of the bottom of society,the improvement of Social security network, etc., at this time have been neglected. The civil society organizations associated with these traditional issues, such as trade unions, soon fade. After 1970s, the number of union decline rapidly, the unionized workers was only 12.3% of all workers. Civil society and social movements gradually went far from the broad social soil, no longer was rooted in the grassroots community, and no longer represent the majority of Americans. Therefore, civil society lost the valuable critical spirit, the social movements are at a low ebb,can’t effectively restrict the political -
economic elite
28 In this period, the link between social movements and political parties have also changed. In 1960s the reason why the social movements can be able to lead to social reform, is mainly because there is a variety of fully contact and interaction between social organizations for progress and Democratic Party, so the appeal of social movements can enter the actual political process, translate into government policy. there is an interdependent relationship between the Social organizations and the Democratic Party.the former will use their resources in organization to support the the candidates at all levels of Democratic party, and The latter will reflect the demands of the former in policy orientation.
29 However, since the 1970s, the relationship between old organizations for progress and Democratic Party become increasingly weakened. in order to enjoy tax incentives, These organizations seek identity of NGO,and went further from political parties
30 In contrast, the Republican Party because of the support of the financial and other elite, is relatively abundant in capital, and thus have the ability to cultivate a number of conservative social organizations to help the Republican Party to carry out election activities to promote their ideas. Indeed many middle-class tend to have a reverse psychology on the affirmative action and policy in income redistribution in 1960s ,and become in favor of conservatism. This is the social basis of.Republican Party to implement the neo-liberal policies
31 Future Perspective
The Republicans began to carry out neoliberal policies from the 1980s, led to that the U.S. economy was gradually controlled by financial capital, and ultimately caused the crisis. Meanwhile, the class structure of American society has undergone great changes, there is a rapid increase in the financial elite, and polarization prevails. The social movements had been at a low ebb since 1970s, the relationship between civil society and the Democratic Party fracture.with the the Differentiation of political power and the power of organization weakened makes them unable to resist . , therefore, the financial and economic crisis in 2008, did not immediately lead to large-scale social movement., things have not really changed Until the "occupation of Wall Street" campaign spontaneously rise among American people. This shows the progressive social movements in long-term; the other hand, it shows the social movements have declined for a long time.it also shows people have been dis content for a long time .where there is a increasing dissatisfaction,there , is aiso a channel to vent
。32 However, , only the social movements find their political allies and enter into the political process and it will play a substantive impact on the political field and policy-making. it is possible when the general public and the industry elite re-form a political alliances, and break the monopoly of the financial elite. However, the U.S. industrial structure have greated changed and, the slump in economic continued to to restructuring,there is great doubt whether the industry elite can make it.
On the condition of globalization, the problem of the high unemployment rate in short time cannot be solved。 Because the cost in developing countries are lower, the labor are cheaper， Capital enjoy better treatmen。 As long as the capital is still chasing higher profits， The decline of american the real economy is inevitable。 Besides the financial industry is the United States ‘economy‘ core industry and the commercial institutions are too big to fall, before the new technology revolution’s arrival, people had to endure the bad economic conditions for a very long time. But American ordinary people are not the only injured。 in Developing countries workers’ pay is very low, work hours are much longer ， the working conditions were poor， there is always no welfare。These countries ‘environment are polluted， resources are consuming rapidly。Although the short-term economy has developed rapidly, Butit is destined to be unsustainable
99the Occupation of Wall Street movement make people think deeply.is ther a conflict between Equality and freedom? What does Equality mean, equality in opportunity or equality in results? Is freedom in economic without restrictions? Who benefits most in globalization? As more and more people were abandoned when the social processes, will the development sustain long?