侏罗纪公园英文观后感

时间:2024.4.25

It goes without saying that Jurassic Park is one of my favourite movies I have seen.

This story is about the dinosaurs assaulted people when the dinosaurs escaped from the Jurassic Park and people brought the dinosaurs to their knees finally. Obviously, the dinosaurs were strong and fierce. However, they couldn't live in the earth with people peaceful whatever in the movie or in the real life I think. And the discussion of the dinosaurs can't stop. We should increase the awareness of the importance of the dinosaurs and other paleontology.

The dinosaurs are the history. The history is the essence of the world and it has a profound impact on both individuals and society.


第二篇:《侏罗纪公园》英文影评


H11001016 Friedrich (Feng Xin) Essay 2 Draft 2

Just the Good Scene?

Jurassic Park is an eternal science fiction which was showed in theaters in 1993. This film is adapted by a Michael Crichton’s novel and its director is Steven Spielberg.

Jurassic Park was ranked within the top ten in the global box office chart until 2007. It achieved several Academy Awards, including Best Visual Effects, Best Sound Editing and Best Sound in 1994. What is more, BAFTA Film Award, People's Choice Award and some other famous film awards gave Jurassic Park lots of honors.

However, some people said that Jurassic Park could achieve success only because of its great scenes. They said Jurassic Park lacks of meaningful theme and its plot is boring. Mike Clark is one of the opponents for Jurassic Park. According to his review in USA Today, “Spielberg’s talent has run out, but his colorful lights are still moving; it may give this 90-minute film too much, and the roles are stuffy.” (Clark, An Unprepared Ending) Mike Clark pointed out that the plot is boring and the structure of production does not have any creativity. First, the story is too simple. A group of rescue workers came to the island to rescue two men, unimportant characters had dead quickly, and important figures had a satisfactory ending in the Hollywood ways at the end. Second, usually, only the first episode of the film series will be fine; then the sequels would be worse and worse. This sentence is basic for the three-movie Jurassic Park series. If you say Jurassic Park I created several points audience were interested in, then

Jurassic Park III only replayed these points to treat audience perfunctorily with nothing else.

Despite the film being criticized by some people, more people thought highly of Jurassic Park. In Jay Karl’s review in New York Times, "Jurassic Park can completely be regarded as the best sci-fi movie that is able to combine art with entertainment so wonderfully.”(Karl, A Perfect Combination)

Being directly confronted with Mike Clark, Jay Karl said Jurassic Park is a meaningful film. This film makes a reflection of the development of society and science: laws of nature can not be violated, or human beings would be punished. In the film, some businessman and scientists copy the DNA of dinosaurs and create dinosaurs in order to earning money. Later, the dinosaurs escape and kill many people. Totally, the wonderful film contains technology alerts and dazzling special effects.

I agree with Jay Karl. At a glance, Jurassic Park is vulgar; in fact, I think Jurassic Park has deep meanings. Just as what Jay Karl said, being mixed with the fighting with dinosaurs, there is the awe of the laws of life. I think Jurassic Park is able to tell audience the truth and the enlightenment when enjoying magnificent scenes, which is a wonderful job.

The only drawback is the ending of Jurassic Park I. Mike Clark said the film stopped too hurriedly at the end. When the film is going to end, most audience thought there would be a climax, but it was wrong. Several pterosaurs beat their wings across the sea away, then to the end. I think Spielberg would better provide more pleasant surprise for audience here. I think it would be better if the pterosaurs hit the

main characters’ plane and then broken a fight.

In any case, Spielberg played the fusion of art and business to the extreme. In his film, dinosaurs are not monotonous and clumsy supporting roles any more, they become eye-catching protagonists. What is more, Spielberg made Jurassic Park a indelible mark in film history.

(638 words)

Works Cited Mike Clark, USA Today: “Jurassic Park” with An Unprepared Ending, 1993, Print. Jay Karl, New York Times: “Jurassic Park”—A Perfect Combination of Arts and Entertainment, 1993, Print.

更多相关推荐:
侏罗纪公园观后感

复活已灭绝生物与遵从自然规律侏罗纪公园观后感1006132311王然军斯蒂文斯皮尔伯格的每一部电影都是值得观众思考的有内涵有深度的侏罗纪公园就是其中之一剧情讲述了哈蒙德博士在进行恐龙的研究过程中发现了一只吸了恐...

侏罗纪公园观后感

从生物演化看侏罗纪公园在观看侏罗纪公园这部电影后震撼之余使我印象最深的一幕是霸王龙的出场伴随着大地的颤抖和一个羊骨头的从天而降硕大无比的侏罗纪地球霸主霸王龙亮相了这时主人公DrGrant说了一句keepabso...

《侏罗纪公园》——观后感

侏罗纪公园观后感弱肉强食适者生存这是大自然的发展规律恐龙的灭绝是大自然选择的结果人类不可能违背大自然的规律来创造生物限制生物的发展人类没有权利控制一种生物的生存或者消亡人类所能做的只有影响影响他们的生存在侏罗纪...

艺术与娱乐完美结合的典范-《侏罗纪公园》观后感

艺术与娱乐完美结合的典范侏罗纪公园观后感电影是影像的艺术所以绝佳的创意必须有足够强硬的技术支持才能展现给观众流芳百世这也是绝大多数经典的科幻电影作品都产在科技一直走在世界前端的美国的原因由于技术所限早期的科幻电...

《侏罗纪公园》英文影评

H11001016FriedrichFengXinEssay2Draft2JusttheGoodSceneJurassicParkisaneternalsciencefictionwhichwasshowedintheatersi...

观侏罗纪公园所想

观侏罗纪公园所想十一月二十号晚上观看了电影侏罗纪公园影片讲述阿兰葛兰特与艾丽塞特勒都是研究上古动植物的科学家他们将全部精力投入到挖掘恐龙骨骼化石上直到一天亿万富翁努布拉岛的主人哈蒙德博士前来请他们出山原来哈蒙德...

对《侏罗纪公园》的新思考,新认知

对侏罗纪公园的新思考新认知摘要通过查资料对这部电影有了更新的认知比如其科学可行性意义对我们的启发等关键词侏罗纪公园错误梦想幻想生命正文课上再一次看了侏罗纪公园这部电影与多年前有着完全不同的感触因此利用课余时间查...

电影《侏罗纪公园》中的工程伦理分析

电影侏罗纪公园中的工程伦理分析剧情简介阿兰葛兰特与艾丽塞特勒都是研究上古动植物的科学家他们将全部精力投入到挖掘恐龙骨骼化石上直到一天亿万富翁努布拉岛的主人哈蒙德博士前来请他们出山原来哈蒙德手下的大批科学家利用凝...

侏罗纪世界观后感

20xx年7月5日星期日侏罗纪世界好莱坞大片就我的感受而言的确称得上是大片整个片子全程无尿点用高端大气上档次低调奢华有内涵来形容一点都不为过相比国内那些宣传做得很好的影片来说表达的内容和方式以及观影的质感都要好...

楚门的世界 英文观后感

TheTrumanShowisablackcomedybutitcannotmakemefeelhappyOnthecontraryitmakesmeanxiousandcanthelpthinkingaboutourlifeTr...

楚门的世界英文观后感

楚门的世界英文观后感楚门的世界英文gt观后感一UnusuallyintelligentJimCarreymovieaprovocativeandprescientmediasatirePutsBigBrothe...

楚门的世界观后感(英文版)

TheTrumanShowTheTrumanShowwasbeon19xxandthedirectorisPeterWeirItisaveryclassicfilmInthisfilmTrumanslifewasmadeintoa...

侏罗纪公园观后感英文(6篇)