电影勇敢的心观后感

电影勇敢的心>观后感（一）

终于看完了勇敢的心这部电影了，同时也意味着我们电影赏析的这门课程也要结束了。一学期过得真快。

在威廉·华莱士还是孩子的时候，他的父亲，苏格兰的英雄马索·华莱士在与英军的斗争中牺牲了。光阴似箭，英王为巩固在苏格兰的统治，颁布法令允许英国贵族在自己苏格兰的封地上享有结婚少女以便让贵族开发并统治苏格兰。这道法令虽然表面上会有利于英国统治苏格兰，但更会激起苏格兰人民的反抗。年轻的威廉·华莱士学成回到故乡，向美丽的少女梅伦求婚，并与其私定终身，愿意做一个安分守己的人。然而梅伦却被英国贵族无理抢去，并遭杀害，华莱士终于爆发了。在广大村民高呼“英雄之子”的呼喊声中，他们揭竿而起，杀英兵宣布起义。

华莱士，终其一生都是一个斗士，一个为了爱情而斗的斗士，一个为了自由而斗的斗士，一个为了国家和命运而斗的斗士。他是一个让人尊敬的英雄。

他的爱情，这部片他的爱情分成了两部分。一个就是和小时候的梅伦，一个美丽的苏格兰姑娘，一个在他父亲的葬礼后送了一枝花安慰他的人。华莱士求学有成后回来向他求婚。因为当时贵族享有初夜权的原因，他们在森林里偷偷的结婚了，这里可以体现出他的一种反抗的精神，一种本能的叛逆。但他们的爱情没有维系多久，因为梅伦的美丽太耀眼了，贵族杀了梅伦，这是苏格兰和英格兰的战斗的导火线，因为这引发了华莱士的爆发，揭竿而起，各地响应。第二段是与皇后的感情。皇后丈夫本来就是个同性恋，包办的婚姻让她感觉不到爱情的存在，根本没有感情可言。缺乏了爱情的滋润，让为爱情而起的华莱士走进了她的心灵，她自然为华莱士的豪情倾倒了。而华莱士则是在为了自由而奋身博杀，因为失去了梅伦，他一直在为了他的信念作战，皇后的美丽和善良感动了他，两颗干枯的心就这样融在了一起。

勇敢的心是震撼人心的，因为这里有可贵的思想——自由。没有自由了你们还能干什么？也许是真的，我们也该好好思量思量。

电影勇敢的心观后感（二）

《勇敢的心》又名《惊世未了缘》，是19xx年上市的一部动作、爱情、战争、传记片。它不单单是一部艺术作品，更是一部鲜活的史实。>故事发生在十三世纪，英格兰统治苏格兰时期。威廉华莱士，一个贵族佃农的儿子，领导苏格兰一步步摆脱英国殖民残暴统治，最终走向了独立与自由。

以往的战争片留给观众的印象大多是血腥、暴力的打斗场面。或许一个好的摄像师、一个好的打斗指导加上优秀的场面布景足以烘托出影片的视觉效果，从而将影片作为一部优秀的战争片推向全国乃至世界，但《勇敢的心》之所以能够成为经典佳作，决不仅仅如此。它有机的将战争因素与爱情因素相结合，两者的合并始终牵引着故事情节的发

展，同样牵引着荧幕前每一个观赏者的心。

之所以有“战争”，是因为有“爱”。世界上没有一个战争是由于纯粹的愤怒所激化而来的。影片中的战争也是如此。只不过，片中的“爱”是多元化，更富有灵魂的。高尚无比的爱情和浴血奋战的民族情是本片的感情线。华莱士作为一个小小的苏格兰人最终能够领导解放革命走向胜利，这一切是因为他不惜任何代价的爱着自己的妻子、爱着自己的祖国、爱着自己的民族，甚至不惜用自己充实着热血的生命来祭奠苏格兰人的土地与苏格兰人的自由。

威廉华莱士，不是一个天生的好战者。当幼小的他看到自己的父亲为了民族的自由而失去生命的一霎那，他仍然没有下决心立志或复仇。对于他来讲，反而更需要一个和平的处境、与平凡的生活。当成年的华莱士回归到自己的土地时，他曾说：“我回家是要种田成家，只求能平安的生活。”观众看到这句话时，很难将当前的华莱士与影片结尾那个躺在死刑台却仍然高呼自由的他相提并论。但实际上原因很简单，当时英国政府为了平反，赋予了贵族头领初夜权。所有的贵族头领可以凭借自己的权力夺取平民中初婚女子的初夜。当恶魔的魔爪降临在他的妻子身上时，他义无反顾的抗争，夺取了小小的胜利，但却永远的失去了深爱的人。也正是因为他失去了妻子梅伦，所以下定决心要走上反抗的道路。同时，他父亲遗留给他的>勇气与寻求自由的渴望也被一触即发。仇恨背后是一片片爱，父亲与妻子总在梦里与他相见，告知他要苏醒过来，为勇气而战，为自由而战。爱的仇恨也就由此萌生了。

影片中多次运用了“幻境”的表现手法，将浓郁的情与残暴的战争作对比，同时也牵连着主人公内心深处的情感线索。第一个幻境是在父亲死后的夜里，摄像机由远及近，最后拉至父亲死后的脸庞，给与了一个特写。父亲将脸缓缓向右转过来，对小华莱士说：“你的心是自由的，要有勇气去追寻。”这一句话带着父亲对儿子的爱和对殖民者的愤怒直接的传递到观众的耳朵里。顿时，“勇敢的心”有了依据，主人公的人物也就更为丰富了。第二个幻境是在妻子死后的一天，当华莱士已经初步踏上革命的征途时。妻子出现在他的梦境，告知他要醒过来，随时保持清醒，看清身边的每一个人。当他看到妻子的眼眸时，是那样的不解与疑惑。他低下头，眼神里流露出对妻子的歉意所带来的悲痛。但他却记得了妻子的嘱托，才有了后来战争的屡次胜利。第三个幻境，是在华莱士躺在死刑台上时，当斧头举在半空即将砍向他的脖子时，他意外的看到在人群中的梅伦。梅伦的表情格外的镇定，恬静的脸庞依旧带着微微的笑。直到那一刹那，她都没有放弃对丈夫的鼓励和肯定。一个眼神留给观众更多的遐想空间。而此时的华莱士正在通向死亡的路上，意外的是从他的眼神里却看不到一丝畏惧，而是思索。深情的双眸无法逃离幻境中妻子的眼神，正如他无法逃离那重重的一斧，平静中的爱没有一丝吝惜的呈现在观赏者的眼前。霎时间，影片的高潮吞噬了观众的思绪。

三个幻境不只是导演的手段，而是思想的抒发。战争会停止，人会死去，只有爱是永恒的。

另外，在人物的刻画上，也充分体现出作者对故事中“情感”的着重。作者要的主人公不是一个武夫，而是一个智者。换句话讲，一味的武夫无法成就如此之大的使命。在影片的开头，小华莱士在父亲死后的一个镜头里，他握着父亲的宝剑，双眼死死的盯着它。然而叔叔却夺过宝剑告诉他：“要先学会用脑子，再学用剑。”这让他想起父亲

生前也曾这样对他说过。这一句话虽很简短，但对于人物的塑造来讲是必不可少的，它突出了人物的感性，从侧面减少了一个凶悍战士的莽撞，同时也是故事情节不可缺少的铺垫。其次，作者笔下的华莱士也不是一个有极大野心的人。换句话说，他对革命的领导并不持有当王的目的。这也就又成为影片的亮点之一。影片中，贵族罗伯希望华莱士的军队加入贵族，但华莱士反驳道：“人不会追随头衔，而是追随勇气，贵族平民都尊重你。若你带领他们朝自由，他们会追随你，我也会??”讲出这句话是要有一定勇气的，同时也要负责任。倘若有一天他们革命胜利了，华莱士会放弃最高荣誉而兑现当时的诺言。可见，他领导的战争是骨子里的仇恨，情感上的对峙。因为仇恨里融有父亲、妻子、民族的血和爱??

战争的胜利离不开伊莎贝对华莱士的爱，伊莎贝与英王独子的婚姻只是政治利益的交换，并无真实的爱情。当伊莎贝见到华莱士的第一眼时，就深深的爱上了他。她被他的真实和勇敢所打动，虽然他们道理上是敌人。于是她多次透漏情报给华莱士，使其避免多次灾难。这一人物表面上看起来可有可无，实际却不然。她的存在极大的讽刺了英国王室，助长了华莱士军的势气。而且表达了世间没有任何界限能圈住爱情的脚步，即使他们理应是敌人??

勇敢的心是一颗怎样的心？影片中一直都在述说。寡不敌众的情况下，用土制刀具横扫英军需要一颗勇敢的心；孤身一人独闯城堡暗杀一百多叛徒需要一颗勇敢的心；独自进入敌营与贵族谈判需要一颗勇敢的心；面对斧头高喊自由需要一颗勇敢的心??

《勇敢的心》能捧回奥斯卡小金人并在全球大热自有它的成功之道。它的商业价值和教育意义都是极其丰富的。一部好作品要具有观赏性，更重要的是能够净化观赏者的内心。当两者并存，展现在舞台上。我们才可称之为佳作。《勇敢的心》适合各个年龄段的观众观看，前提是它是历史，加上导演的二度创作，它的现实和艺术价值也就同时具备了。

电影勇敢的心观后感（三）

华莱士，终其一生都是一个斗士，一个为了爱情而斗的斗士，一个为了自由而斗的斗士，一个为了国家和命运而斗的斗士。他是一个让人尊敬的英雄。

他的成长，对他而言，真正的成长是在失去了父亲以后。之前他只不过是一个单纯的小孩而已。当他看到那个小屋里被人吊死的同胞，他震吓。但他父亲哥哥死后，他却变得勇敢，敢于面对死亡了，面对他父亲和哥哥的遗体，他变得如此平静。再后来，他叔叔把他带走，说是人要先学会用他的脑袋才能真正的战斗，把他带去接受教育，这个是他的故事的开端，也是他生命意义上的>长大了。

他的爱情，这部片他的爱情分成了两部分。一个就是和小时候的梅伦，一个美丽的苏格兰姑娘，一个在他父亲的葬礼后送了一枝花安慰他的人。华莱士求学有成后回来向他求婚。因为当时贵族享有初夜权的原因，他们在森林里偷偷的结婚了，这里可以体现出他的一种反抗的精神，一种本能的叛逆。但他们的爱情没有维系多久，因为梅伦的美丽太耀眼了，贵族杀了梅伦，这是苏格兰和英格兰的战斗的导火线，因为这引发了华莱士的爆发，揭竿而起，各地响应。第二段是与皇后的感情。皇后丈夫本来就是个同性恋，

包办的婚姻让她感觉不到爱情的存在，根本没有感情可言。缺乏了爱情的滋润，让为爱情而起的华莱士走进了她的心灵，她自然为华莱士的豪情倾倒了。而华莱士则是在为了自由而奋身博杀，因为失去了梅伦，他一直在为了他的信念作战，皇后的美丽和善良感动了他，两颗干枯的心就这样融在了一起。

他的战斗，华莱士开始战斗的时候，是因为贵族杀了他的妻子梅伦，可以说是一个简单的复仇行动，但事情一开始就不能再受到控制的，尤其是领导权掌握在一个聪明人的手里。后来，他们起义得到了各地不断的支持，这让人看到了苏格兰的自由希望。一个方面是因为他们苏格兰的人受迫压太久了，再加上华莱士所学的智慧，他们势如破竹，这就很让人，特别是爱德华心慌了。想尽办法招安华莱士，最后还是利用了一个骗局把华莱士抓了。

最后，在砍头台。这里是这部片的一个精华了，思想就是在这里的。行刑前，两个小丑在那里舞尽丑态，让人发笑，但也是说明了英国人的行为恰恰就是两个小丑所为。华莱士就刑，行人对这位英雄扔鸡蛋、烂菜，恰恰说明了国民的麻木和愚昧。后来在刑台上，华莱士受尽了各样残酷的折磨，下面则是一片欢呼声。华莱士就刑前，看到那个小孩在笑，可能这里也是一个希望的延续，把希望寄托给了后人。那声振馈发聋的“freedom”让人久久不能放下思想，激人不断前进。可以说，在刑台这段，是鲜明的对比让这个自由的精神体现的淋漓尽致的。一边是斗士、英雄，一边是愚昧的国民；一边是前进中的先锋，一边是止步不前的落伍者。差距就在这里体现了，代沟在这里产生。

勇敢的心是震撼人心的，因为这里有可贵的思想——自由。没有自由了你们还能干什么？也许是真的，我们也该好好思量思量。

就这样，一个学期的电影赏析就结束了，心里承载着很多的感触和感动。这条路没有走完，电影将陪伴我们的一生。

第二篇：英语作文电影读后感-勇敢的心

azbxz 发表于：07-07-28 13:33 勇敢的心英文影评 A movie review by James Berardinelli The crown jewel of 1995's summer blockbusters appears to have arrived early. It's hard to imagine any motion picture released between now and August matching Mel Gibson's Braveheart for spectacle. With its clashing armies, heartstopping action, and grand sense of romance, this is the sort of film it's a pleasure to see and review. Let me state my preferences up front. I'm a big fan of the epic adventure, a category in which Braveheart, like cream, rises to the top. There's a lot in this film that's praiseworthy -- not the least of which is its ambition. Those viewing this picture may be easily reminded of Gettysburg, The Last of the Mohicans, Glory, and such classics as Lawrence of Arabia, El Cid, and Spartacus. The grandeur is certainly present; nevertheless, Gibson gives us not only memorable battles, but characters of real substance. Borrowing from masters like Sam Peckinpah and David Lean, the actor/director has crafted an exceptional cinematic tapestry in only his sophomore effort. Most of the time, three hour movies have a few flat spots, but Braveheart is constantly on the move -- riveting from start to finish. When the end credits began to roll, I was hard pressed to accept that nearly 170 minutes had elapsed. The title character is William Wallace (Gibson), a hero of Scottish history whose legend has surely outstripped fact (in its own unique way, the film acknowledges this). Wallace fought for Scotland's freedom in the late 13th century, wielding his broadsword and influence to defeat the forces of King Edward I (Patrick McGoohan), the British monarch who had declared himself king of Scotland upon the former ruler's demise. Braveheart builds slowly to its first gritty climax. Much of the early film concentrates on Wallace's love for Murron (Catherine McCormack). Their courtship is unhurried, yet this is all preparation. The real meat of the story, which includes political mechanations, betrayal, and dramatic battles, is yet to come. Patrick Henry once said, "Give me liberty, or give me death!" That might well be Wallace's motto. "It's all for nothing if you don't have freedom!" The nobles of Scotland fight for land and riches, but Wallace stands for the individual, and earns respect with words and deeds. Bulked up and wearing a long-haired wig, Gibson brings his usual wealth of charisma to the title role. Patrick McGoohan, best known from TV's Secret Agent Man and The Prisoner, is almost unrecognizable beneath a snowy beard. His Edward the Longshanks exudes an aura of cold menace. He's a worthy foe for Wallace because his intelligence matches his ruthlessness. Sophie Marceau, the French actress who plays Princess Isabelle, and Catherine McCormack are both immensely appealing. Braveheart is a brutal, bloody motion picture, but the violence is not gratuitous. The maimings, decapitations, and other assorted gruesome deta

ils make Wallace's world seem real and immediate. In addition, few theatrical moments make a more eloquent statement against war than when Gibson shows women and children weeping over the dead on a body-littered battlefield. War is a two-headed beast, and both faces -- the glorious and the tragic -- are depicted. Lately, certain films have come in pairs: two Robin Hoods, two Columbuses, two Earps, and now two Highlander epics. Rob Roy, the first, is a fine motion picture. Braveheart, however, is better, offering an exhilarating, and occasionally touching, experience that has viewers leaving the theater caught up in an afterglow of wonder. These days, heros like William Wallace are as rare as motion picture displays of this high, uncompromising quality. 另一篇: Set in the late 13th century, 'Braveheart' is the story of one of Scotland's greatest national heroes Sir William Wallace. leader of the Scottish resistance forces during the first years of the long, ultimately successful struggle to free Scotland from English rule... Crucially charismatic in the title role, Gibson plays the heroic figure and emerges as a remarkable hero with wit and romantic soul, determined to rid his country of its English oppressors... Wallace's revolution was set in motion, with great obstacles from his countrymen... Many Scottish nobles lent him only grudging support as most of them were more concerned with wealth and titles than the freedom of the country... In fact, the Scottish leaders are in favor of revolt-or not-depending on English bribes... Wallace, by comparison, is a man of honor, incorruptible and righteous... He was knighted and proclaimed 'guardian and high protector of Scotland,' but as much as he railed against the Scottish nobles, submitted to Edward I, King of England, he was astonished and in shock to discover the treachery of the leading Scot contender for the throne—Robert, the Earl of Bruce—to whom he confided , 'The people would follow you, if you would only lead them.' Sophie Marceau is exquisite as the distressed princess Isabella of France who ends up falling in love with Wallace, warning him out of several traps... Catherine McCormack is a stunning beauty who ignites Wallace's revolution... Patrick McGoohan is chilling, brutal, and vicious as the ruthless Edward I, known by the nickname 'Longshanks.' This king remains simply the embodiment of evil... While Angus McFadyen moves as a nobleman torn between his conscience and political aspiration, and Brendan Gleeson brings strength and humor to his role as the robust Hamish, David O'Hara is very effective as the crazy Irishman who provides much of the film's comic relief from even the most tensed moments... Mel Gibson has reason to be proud of 'Braveheart.' It is a motion picture that dares to be excessive... Gibson presents passionately the most spaciously impressive battles (yet staged for films) even excessively, and it is his passion and excess that mak

e the motion picture great... The horror and futility of massed hand-to-hand combats are exciting rather repulsive... It is epic film-making at its glorious best... Gibson's 'Braveheart' focuses on the human side of Wallace, a character so immense, so intelligent, and so passionate, exploring the definitions of honor and nobility, pushing us to follow the hero into his struggle against injustice and oppression... 《勇敢的心》 Set in the late 13th century, 'Braveheart' is the story of one of Scotland's greatest national heroes Sir William Wallace. leader of the Scottish resistance forces during the first years of the long, ultimately successful struggle to free Scotland from English rule... Crucially charismatic in the title role, Gibson plays the heroic figure and emerges as a remarkable hero with wit and romantic soul, determined to rid his country of its English oppressors... Wallace's revolution was set in motion, with great obstacles from his countrymen... Many Scottish nobles lent him only grudging support as most of them were more concerned with wealth and titles than the freedom of the country... In fact, the Scottish leaders are in favor of revolt-or not-depending on English bribes... Wallace, by comparison, is a man of honor, incorruptible and righteous... He was knighted and proclaimed 'guardian and high protector of Scotland,' but as much as he railed against the Scottish nobles, submitted to Edward I, King of England, he was astonished and in shock to discover the treachery of the leading Scot contender for the throne—Robert, the Earl of Bruce—to whom he confided , 'The people would follow you, if you would only lead them.' Sophie Marceau is exquisite as the distressed princess Isabella of France who ends up falling in love with Wallace, warning him out of several traps... Catherine McCormack is a stunning beauty who ignites Wallace's revolution... Patrick McGoohan is chilling, brutal, and vicious as the ruthless Edward I, known by the nickname 'Longshanks.' This king remains simply the embodiment of evil... While Angus McFadyen moves as a nobleman torn between his conscience and political aspiration, and Brendan Gleeson brings strength and humor to his role as the robust Hamish, David O'Hara is very effective as the crazy Irishman who provides much of the film's comic relief from even the most tensed moments... Mel Gibson has reason to be proud of 'Braveheart.' It is a motion picture that dares to be excessive... Gibson presents passionately the most spaciously impressive battles (yet staged for films) even excessively, and it is his passion and excess that make the motion picture great... The horror and futility of massed hand-to-hand combats are exciting rather repulsive... It is epic film-making at its glorious best... Gibson's 'Braveheart' focuses on the human side of Wallace, a character so immense, so intelligent, and so passionate, exploring the definitions of honor and nobility, p

ushing us to follow the hero into his struggle against injustice and oppression... *** This comment may contain spoilers *** Set in the late 13th century, 'Braveheart' is the story of one of Scotland's greatest national heroes Sir William Wallace. leader of the Scottish resistance forces during the first years of the long, ultimately successful struggle to free Scotland from English rule... Crucially charismatic in the title role, Gibson plays the heroic figure and emerges as a remarkable hero with wit and romantic soul, determined to rid his country of its English oppressors... Wallace's revolution was set in motion, with great obstacles from his countrymen... Many Scottish nobles lent him only grudging support as most of them were more concerned with wealth and titles than the freedom of the country... In fact, the Scottish leaders are in favor of revolt-or not-depending on English bribes... Wallace, by comparison, is a man of honor, incorruptible and righteous... He was knighted and proclaimed 'guardian and high protector of Scotland,' but as much as he railed against the Scottish nobles, submitted to Edward I, King of England, he was astonished and in shock to discover the treachery of the leading Scot contender for the throne—Robert, the Earl of Bruce—to whom he confided , 'The people would follow you, if you would only lead them.' Sophie Marceau is exquisite as the distressed princess Isabella of France who ends up falling in love with Wallace, warning him out of several traps... Catherine McCormack is a stunning beauty who ignites Wallace's revolution... Patrick McGoohan is chilling, brutal, and vicious as the ruthless Edward I, known by the nickname 'Longshanks.' This king remains simply the embodiment of evil... While Angus McFadyen moves as a nobleman torn between his conscience and political aspiration, and Brendan Gleeson brings strength and humor to his role as the robust Hamish, David O'Hara is very effective as the crazy Irishman who provides much of the film's comic relief from even the most tensed moments... Mel Gibson has reason to be proud of 'Braveheart.' It is a motion picture that dares to be excessive... Gibson presents passionately the most spaciously impressive battles (yet staged for films) even excessively, and it is his passion and excess that make the motion picture great... The horror and futility of massed hand-to-hand combats are exciting rather repulsive... It is epic film-making at its glorious best... Gibson's 'Braveheart' focuses on the human side of Wallace, a character so immense, so intelligent, and so passionate, exploring the definitions of honor and nobility, pushing us to follow the hero into his struggle against injustice and oppression... There is a great shot of the lovely mountains of Scotland covered in mist with beautiful bagpipe music... James Horner's beautiful score, calls up memories of his work for 'Titanic.' ----------老生帮你找了一

篇，单词字数应该够了吧？ 回答者： 无聊老生 - 状元 十五级 12-8 10:32