2015运城市技能大赛参赛心得

20xx年度的“运城市技能大赛”虽然早已落下了帷幕，但现在回想起比赛的各个环节依然让人感慨万千。在那段紧张而又充实的时间里，虽然忙一点、累一点但确确实实学到了许多宝贵、有价值的东西。作为电子商务教师组的参赛选手，我真诚的感谢此次技能大赛给我们搭建了这样一个相互交流学习的平台，给了我们一个很好的发挥潜能和培养能力的机会，无论是从赛前的紧张准备，还是从赛时的忘我和赛后获奖的喜悦来讲，都让我受益非浅，感受颇多。现在我就赛后的一点感受和认识与大家分享一下。

电子商务组的比赛由理论和实操两个环节组成。规则要求理论部分占总成绩的30%，实际操作部分分为网络营销和在线交易两部分占总成绩的70%。在备赛的过程中，我们把主要精力都放在了理论上，因为实际操作的平台是采用的电子商务技能鉴定的B2B的平台，我们根本就没接触过，网上也无法下载试用。经过赛前短短的培训，我们发现与我们平时接触的B2C平台还有一定区别。但我们没有放弃，在比赛前一天，我们通过上网了解B2B交易的大概流程和注意事项以及每个人所应担任的角色。最终我们组以实操满分，理论均分106的成绩拿下了教师组的第二名。

当然，尽管比赛的结果让我们深受鼓舞，但赛后反思时，我们也发现比赛当中暴露了不少问题，比如，商品摄影方面的技巧不够熟练，图片处理速度上还有些慢，在最后的网页制作部分也浪费了不少时间。通过此次比赛，我们深刻的认识到电子商务是一门综合性较强的学科，

对个人的综合素质要求较高，凭借一技之长生存下去的机会会越来越少，未来的电子商务需要的是一种复合型人才。

所以，在我们以后的教学过程中，不仅要引导学生向不同的方向发展，更要注重自身素质的提高，争取把自己打造成为一名全面手，让自己能胜任电子商务各个方面的教学需求。

2015稷山职业中学 贾 鹏 年11月10日

第二篇：3200-贾鹏

METHOD 3200

SW-846 is not intended to be an analytical training manual. Therefore, method

procedures are written based on the assumption that they will be performed by analysts who are formally trained in at least the basic principles of chemical analysis and in the use of the subject technology.

In addition, SW-846 methods, with the exception of required method use for the analysis of method-defined parameters, are intended to be guidance methods which contain general information on how to perform an analytical procedure or technique which a laboratory can use as a basic starting point for generating its own detailed Standard Operating Procedure (SOP), either for its own general use or for a specific project application.

1.0 SCOPE AND APPLICATION

1.1 This method contains a sequential extraction and separation procedure that may be used in conjunction with a determinative method to differentiate mercury species that are present in soils and sediments. This method provides information on both total mercury and various mercury species.

1.2 The speciation of a metal, in this case mercury, involves determining the actual form of the molecules or ions that are present in the sample. When combined with an

appropriate determinative method, this procedure is designed to provide varying degrees of mercury species information. All metal speciation methods are operationally defined by the level of post-extraction processing and the chosen method of analysis. Examples of the operationally-defined mercury fractions and individual species that may be determined using this procedure are presented in the table below.

The environmental mobility and toxicity of mercury in a soil profile depend on its

speciation. Alkyl mercury species such as methylmercury are at least an order of magnitude more mobile than inorganic mercury species, and thus are more toxic and more readily

bioaccumulated. Soluble inorganic mercury species such as mercury chloride are more easily transported by natural process than the other inorganic mercury species and serve as the

substrate for mercury methylation process (Ref. 1). These extractable organomercury species and extractable inorganic species contribute the major portion of mercury potential toxicity in the soils. The mercury species that fall into the "semi-mobile" category such as elemental mercury are less toxic than extractable mercury species. The "non-mobile" mercury species such as mercury sulfide are chemically stable in the soil for geologic time periods and thus are least toxic.

3200 - 1 Revision 0

July 2005

Operationally-Defined Mercury Fractions

Total Mercury

Extractable

Mercury Individual Mercury Species CAS No. CH3HgCl

Mercury CHCHHgCl

HgCl2

Hg(OH)2 Mercury

Hg(NO3)2

HgSO4

HgO

Hg2+ complexesc

Non-extractable Semi-mobile Hg

Mercury Mercury Hg0-Md

Hg2+ complexesc

Hg2Cl2 (minor)

Non-mobile Hg2Cl2 (major)

HgS Mercury

HgSe

a

b 115-09-3 107-27-7 7487-94-7 b? 10045-94-0 13766-44-4 21908-53-2 ? 7439-97-6 ? ? 10112-91-1 10112-91-1 1344-48-5 20601-83-6 Chemical Abstract Service Registry Number Not registered by the Chemical Abstract Service cCertain inorganic mercury complexes may be present in both the organic and inorganic extractable fractions dThis represents a mercury-metal amalgam

1.3 Quantification of mercury in the different fractions may be performed using any suitable technique with appropriate precision and accuracy, for example Method 7473, 1631, or Methods 7470 and 7471. Other analytical techniques, such as gas chromatography-mass

spectrometry (GC-MS), ion chromatography or high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with either GC-MS or inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) detection

(Method 6020), or other hyphenated and/or mass spectrometric techniques, may be employed if performance appropriate for the intended application can be demonstrated. This method may also be applicable to other matrices, such as industrial and municipal waste materials, but its performance on such matrices has not yet been evaluated. Method 6800 (Elemental and

Speciated Isotope Dilution Mass Spectrometry) (Ref. 2) may also be applicable as a diagnostic and validation tool for quantification of selectively extracted mercury species, especially when species transformations occur in the sample preparation or analysis procedures.

1.4 Analysts should consult the disclaimer statement at the front of the manual and the information in Chapter Two for guidance on the intended flexibility in the choice of methods, apparatus, materials, reagents, and supplies, and on the responsibilities of the analyst for

demonstrating that the techniques employed are appropriate for the analytes of interest, in the matrix of interest, and at the levels of concern.

In addition, analysts and data users are advised that, except where explicitly specified in a regulation, the use of SW-846 methods is not mandatory in response to Federal testing

requirements. The information contained in this method is provided by EPA as guidance to be used by the analyst and the regulated community in making judgments necessary to generate results that meet the data quality objectives for the intended application.

3200 - 2 Revision 0

July 2005

1.5 Use of this method is restricted to use by, or under supervision of, personnel

appropriately experienced and trained in the use of metal speciation and analysis techniques. Each analyst must demonstrate the ability to generate acceptable results with this method.

2.0 SUMMARY OF METHOD

2.1 For the determination of extractable mercury species, a representative sample aliquot is extracted with an appropriate volume of solvent at elevated temperatures. Extraction is accomplished with the aid of either microwave irradiation or ultrasound.

2.2 Following initial extraction the resultant extracts are separated from the remaining sample matrix for analysis of extractable mercury by an appropriate technique. The residual sample matrix may be analyzed for non-extractable mercury using an appropriate technique.

2.3 The method also has provisions for the separation of the extractable mercury fraction into inorganic and organic mercury fractions or individual species. The inorganic and organic mercury fractions may be separated by using a solid-phase extraction procedure. Individual species may be separated and determined by using an HPLC or other appropriate separation device coupled to an appropriate detector.

2.4 The method also has provisions for the separation of the non-extractable mercury fraction into semi-mobile and non-mobile mercury fractions using sequential acid extraction and digestion.

3.0 DEFINITIONS

3.1 Species - The actual form of a molecule or ion that is present in a sample.

3.2 Sub-speciation - The process by which mercury species in the extractable mercury or non-extractable fraction are further subdivided.

3.3 Total mercury - Total mercury content within the sample, including all inorganic, organic, and complex forms of mercury.

3.4 Extractable mercury - An operationally-defined fraction of mercury which can be extracted from the sample using the protocols described within this method. The extractable mercury is meant to represent both organic and inorganic forms of mercury which are more labile.

3.5 Extractable inorganic mercury - An operationally-defined subset of the extractable mercury species, i.e., the fraction of inorganic mercury species which can be extracted from the sample using the protocols described within this method.

3.6 Extractable organic mercury - An operationally-defined subset of the extractable mercury species, i.e., the fraction of organic mercury species which can be extracted from the sample using the protocols described within this method.

3.7 Non-extractable mercury - The operationally-defined fraction of mercury remaining in the sample after using the extraction protocols described within this method. The non-extractable mercury is meant to represent the least labile forms of mercury.

3200 - 3 Revision 0

July 2005

3.8 Semi-mobile mercury - An operationally-defined subset of the non-extractable mercury species, i.e., the fraction of mercury species which can be extracted from the sample using the mild-acid extraction protocol(s) described within.

3.9 Non-mobile mercury - An operationally-defined subset of the non-extractable mercury species, i.e., the fraction of mercury species which can be extracted from the sample using the harsh-acid extraction protocol(s) described within.

3.10 Refer to Chapter One and Chapter Three for other applicable definitions.

3.11 See Ref. 3 for additional definitions for "species" and "speciation".

4.0 INTERFERENCES

4.1 Solvents, reagents, glassware, and other sample processing hardware may yield artifacts and/or interferences to sample analysis. All of these materials must be demonstrated to be free from interferences under the conditions of the analysis by analyzing method blanks. Specific selection of reagents and purification of solvents by distillation in all-glass systems may be necessary. Refer to each method to be used for specific guidance on quality control procedures and to Chapter Three for general guidance on the cleaning of glassware.

4.2 Transformations among mercury species have been reported and experimentally verified. For example, methylmercury formed during sample processing from inorganic

mercury, may cause positive biases in the methylmercury results (Ref. 4-6). Also, a conversion of methylmercury and ethylmercury to inorganic mercury has been observed under certain sample processing conditions (Figures 1 and 2) (Ref. 7).

4.3 The possibility of species interconversions cannot be eliminated due to the necessary reagents, sample matrix, the combination of reagents and matrix, and/or the

extraction method used. Method 6800 has successfully been used to monitor and correct for such species transformations during speciation of chromium and mercury (Ref. 8-10).

4.4 When non-specific detection techniques are employed, the analyst must be aware of possible interferences. For example, certain organic compounds may absorb at the wavelength of interest when ultraviolet (UV) detection is used.

formation of a precipitate. Filtration (10-μm pore size or less) may be applicable to

remove such a precipitate. Low recoveries may result from co-precipitation of mercury and other sample components. Rinsing the precipitate on the filter with a 0.1% HCl

solution has been demonstrated to minimize this problem.

5.0 SAFETY

5.1 This method does not address all safety issues associated with its use. The

laboratory is responsible for maintaining a safe work environment and a current awareness file of OSHA regulations regarding the safe handling of the chemicals listed in this method. A reference file of material safety data sheets (MSDSs) should be available to all personnel involved in these procedures.

3200 - 4 Revision 0

July 2005

5.2 The proper handling of inorganic and organomercury compounds can not be overemphasized. Exposure to organo (alkyl) mercury compounds may cause damage to the central nervous system, emotional disturbances, or irritation of the eyes and skin, and may even lead to death (Ref. 11, 12).

5.3 The use of commercially-available protective gear, such as gloves made of nitrile, polyethylene (PE) and ethylvinyl alcohol (EVA) laminate or other appropriate material is

required. Latex gloves are not suitable for the handling of organomercury compounds (Ref. 12) and must not be used. In addition, appropriate eye protection should be used.

5.4 If any organomercury compound makes direct contact with the gloves, remove the gloves immediately, dispose of them properly, and put on new gloves immediately. These materials only provide temporary protection. Consult the glove manufacturer for permeation rates and times. If contact should occur with the skin or eyes, flush with large amounts of water and seek medical attention immediately. Further information on the safety guidelines on the handling of inorganic and organo (alkyl) mercury can be obtained from the material safety data sheets for the substances.

5.5 The preparation and use of concentrated solutions or samples should be carried out in a fume hood (some organomercury compounds are odorless). It is advisable to work inside a plastic container with absorbent pads so that accidental spills will be contained.

5.6 In the event of a spill, the area should be well ventilated and any ignition sources removed. If the spill is a solid, collect and dispose of the material in a sealed container. If the spill is a liquid, absorb on paper towels and discard in a designated waste bin. The

contaminated area can also be cleaned with 0.05% (v/v) 2-mercaptoethanol solution to complex and remove the spilled mercury.

5.7 The extraction process may generate a moderate amount of pressure. Vessels used for extraction should be capable of withstanding these pressures or have pressure relief mechanisms or should be vented during the extraction process.

5.8 For safety precautions associated with determinative methods, consult those methods directly.

6.0 EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES

The mention of trade names or commercial products in this manual is for illustrative purposes only, and does not constitute an EPA endorsement or exclusive recommendation for use. The products and instrument settings cited in SW-846 methods represent those products and settings used during method development or subsequently evaluated by the Agency. Glassware, reagents, supplies, equipment, and settings other than those listed in this manual may be employed provided that method performance appropriate for the intended application has been demonstrated and documented.

This section does not list common laboratory glassware (e.g., beakers and flasks).

6.1 Analytical balance - Capable of accurate weighings to 0.01 g.

6.2 Vials/bottles, amber glass - Sizes as appropriate, e.g., 20 mL, with PTFE-lined screw- caps or crimp-tops for storage of extracts.

3200 - 5 Revision 0

July 2005

6.3 Heating sources – Non-sonicating heating sources with adjustable heating control able to maintain a temperature of 95 ± 2 °C (e.g., microwave heat unit, hot block, hot water bath or other equivalent).

6.4 Sonication heating source - Bath or horn type.

6.5 Graduated cylinder or equivalent volume measuring device.

6.6 Volumetric flasks - Sizes as appropriate.

6.7 pH measuring device – Universal pH paper or calibrated pH meter.

6.8 Solid-phase extraction system - Visiprep solid-phase extraction manifold (Supelco or equivalent system). Consult the manufacturer’s recommendations for the glassware and hardware necessary to perform sample extractions.

6.9 Solid-phase extraction column - 6-mL glass reaction tubes (Supelco) or equivalent, complete with PTFE frits (2 per tube).

6.10 Filtration Device – Vacuum or manual

6.11 Filters – The filter media should have an effective pore size of 1.0 μm or less (glass fiber filters are known to work effectively).

6.12 Temperature measurement device – Device should be capable of measuring up to 100 °C accurate to ± 0.1 °C

6.13 Vortex mixer or equivalent

6.14 Centrifuge - Maximum speed of at least 3200 rpm and capable of handling 10 mL or greater centrifuge tubes

6.15 Centrifuge tubes – Disposable glass centrifuge tubes with capacity of at least 10 mL with snap-on cap

6.16 Microwave solvent extraction apparatus

6.16.1 The temperature performance requirements necessitate that the

laboratory microwave extraction system be capable of sensing the temperature to within ±

2.5oC and automatically adjusting the microwave field output power within 2 sec of

sensing. Temperature sensors should be accurate to ± 2 oC. Temperature feedback

control provides the primary performance mechanism for the method. Measurement in at least one vessel is required and a rotating turntable to homogenize the microwave field to all samples is required for most systems.

6.16.2 Microwave extraction vessels are needed. Vessels are available that can accommodate 1-g to 10-g samples. In addition the vessel apparatus must accommodate the necessary amount of solvent and if appropriate an inner vessel and stir bar and

secondary microwave energy absorber. Vessels should be essentially transparent to

microwave energy (with the exception of purposeful microwave absorbing apparatus

components), relatively inert to reagents and sample components, and capable of

withstanding the temperature and pressure requirements (minimum conditions of 200 °C and 442 psi) necessary to perform this procedure. Follow the manufacturer’s instructions regarding cleaning, handling, and sealing the vessels (Ref. 13).

3200 - 6 Revision 0

July 2005

7.0 REAGENTS AND STANDARDS

Reagent-grade chemicals must be used in all tests. Unless otherwise indicated, it is intended that all reagents conform to the specifications of the Committee on Analytical

Reagents of the American Chemical Society, where such specifications are available. Other grades may be used, provided it is first ascertained that the reagent is of sufficiently high purity to permit its use without lessening the accuracy of the determination.

7.1 Hydrochloric acid (concentrated, 12 M), HCl – Certified ACS Plus grade or

equivalent.

7.2 Sodium hydroxide, NaOH – Certified ACS grade or equivalent.

7.3 Sodium chloride, NaCl – Certified ACS grade or equivalent.

7.4 Copper (II) chloride dihydrate, CuCl2·2H2O - Analytical reagent grade or equivalent.

7.5 Nitric acid (concentrated, 16 M), HNO3 – Certified ACS Plus grade or equivalent.

7.6 Hydrochloric acid (6 M), HCl - Prepared by dilution of 12 M HCl in reagent water.

7.7 Sodium hydroxide (10 M), NaOH - Prepare by dissolution of solid NaOH pellets of appropriate purity in reagent water

7.8 Ethanol, CH3CH2OH - HPLC grade or equivalent.

7.9 Silver nitrate, AgNO3 – Certified ACS grade or equivalent.

7.10 HPLC subspecies option mobile phase components

7.10.1 Methanol, CH3OH - HPLC grade or equivalent.

7.10.2 2-Mercaptoethanol, HSCH2CH2OH - reagent grade.

7.10.3 Ammonium acetate, NH4CO2CH3 - reagent grade.

7.11 Acetic acid, CH3CO2H - HPLC grade or equivalent.

7.12 Sulphydryl cotton fiber (SCF) separation and concentration option

7.12.1 Materials for preparing SCF

7.12.1.1 Cotton - mercury-free cotton fiber.

7.12.1.2 Mercaptoacetic acid (97+%), HSCH2CO2H - analytical reagent

grade.

7.12.1.3 Acetic anhydride, (CH3CO)2O - HPLC grade or equivalent.

7.12.1.4 Sulfuric acid, (concentrated, 18 M), H2SO4 - analytical reagent

grade or spectrograde quality.

7.12.2 SCF eluent solutions

3200 - 7 Revision 0

July 2005

7.12.2.1 SCF eluent 1, an aqueous solution containing 1.0 M HCl and

1.0 M NaCl - Prepare by diluting 20.7 mL of concentrated HCl to 250 mL in reagent

water, then dissolving 14.6 g of NaCl in the prepared 1.0 M HCl.

7.12.2.2 SCF eluent 2, an aqueous solution containing 6 M HCl,

saturated NaCl, and 0.1% CuCl2?2H2O - Prepare by diluting 124 mL of

concentrated HCl to 250 mL in water, then adding 0.25 g of CuCl2?2H2O and 11.0 g

of NaCl.

bottom of the vessel. The top portion of this solution should be used.

7.13 Reagent water - All references to water in the method refer to reagent water unless otherwise specified. Refer to Chapter One for a definition of reagent water.

7.14 2.0% (v/v) HCl + 10% (v/v) ethanol extraction solution - Prepared by dilution of the proper amount of concentrated HCl and ethanol in reagent water.

7.15 1:2 (v/v) HNO3 extraction solution - Prepare by combining 1 part concentrated HNO3 with 2 parts reagent water.

7.16 1:6:7 (v/v/v) HCl : HNO3 : reagent water - Prepare by combining 1 part

concentrated HCl, 6 parts concentrated HNO3 with 7 parts reagent water

7.17 Chloride ion test solution - 0.1 M silver nitrate in 0.1 M HNO3. Commercially prepared 0.1 M silver nitrate solution is available.

7.18 4 M HNO3 extraction solution – Prepared by dilution of the proper amount of concentrated HNO3 in reagent water.

7.19 Inorganic mercury standard solutions - Commercially prepared standards

containing natural isotopically-abundant inorganic mercury species and isotopically-enriched inorganic mercury species, such as Hg2+, are available (Ref. 14, 15). Standard solutions can also be prepared by dissolution of the selected pure solid mercury compound in an appropriate solvent. Mercury compounds must be of known concentration. All solvents used for standards preparation must be analytical reagent grade or equivalent.

7.20 Organic mercury standard solutions - Commercially prepared standards containing natural isotopically-abundant CH3HgCl or other organic mercury species and/or isotopically-enriched CH3HgCl or other organic mercury species are available (Ref. 14, 15). Standard solutions can also be prepared using the pure organic mercury compound and appropriate solvents (Ref. 5). Pure compounds must be of known concentration. Solvents used for standards preparation must be analytical reagent grade or equivalent.

7.21 Sodium acetate, anhydrous, NaCH3CO2 – Certified ACS grade or equivalent.

7.22 Sodium acetate trihydrate, NaCH3CO2·3H2O – Certified ACS grade or equivalent.

7.23 0.2 M acetate buffer solution (pH 3.0) – Mix 11.4 mL of acetic acid and 0.2789 g anhydrous sodium acetate or 0.4627 g sodium acetate trihydrate in reagent water. Dilute to 1 L with reagent water. Measure the pH of the buffer solution and if needed adjust the pH with a strong acid or base.

3200 - 8 Revision 0

July 2005

8.0 SAMPLE COLLECTION, PRESERVATION, AND STORAGE

8.1 Sample handling and preservation procedures should follow the guidelines in the introductory material of Chapter Three, Inorganic Analytes.

8.2 Samples should be collected and placed in containers that are made of glass or other appropriate material.

8.3 Sample extracts should be analyzed within 5 days (Ref. 16).

9.0 QUALITY CONTROL

9.1 Refer to Chapter One for guidance on quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) protocols. When inconsistencies exist between QC guidelines, method-specific QC

criteria take precedence over both technique-specific criteria and those criteria given in Chapter One, and technique-specific QC criteria take precedence over the criteria in Chapter One. Any effort involving the collection of analytical data should include development of a structured and systematic planning document, such as a Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) or a Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP), which translates project objectives and specifications into directions for those that will implement the project and assess the results. Each laboratory should

maintain a formal quality assurance program. The laboratory should also maintain records to document the quality of the data generated. All data sheets and quality control data should be maintained for reference or inspection.

9.2 Before processing any samples, the analyst should demonstrate that all parts of the equipment in contact with the sample and reagents are interference-free. This is

accomplished through the analysis of a method blank. Each time samples are extracted,

cleaned up, and analyzed, and when there is a change in reagents, a method blank should be prepared and analyzed for the analytical species of interest as a safeguard against chronic laboratory contamination. The blanks should be carried through all stages of sample

preparation and analysis.

9.3 Initial demonstration of proficiency

Each laboratory must demonstrate initial proficiency with each sample preparation and determinative method combination it utilizes by generating data of acceptable accuracy and precision for target analytes in a clean matrix. The laboratory must also repeat the

demonstration of proficiency whenever new staff are trained or significant changes in

instrumentation are made. See Method 8000 for information on how to accomplish a

demonstration of proficiency.

9.4 Sample quality control for preparation and analysis

The laboratory must also have procedures for documenting the effect of the matrix on method performance (precision, accuracy, method sensitivity). At a minimum, this should

include the analysis of QC samples including a method blank, a duplicate, a matrix spike and a laboratory control sample (LCS) in each analytical batch. Any method blanks, matrix spike samples, and replicate samples should be subjected to the same analytical procedures (Secs. 4.0 and 11.0) as those used on actual samples.

9.4.1 Method blank: For each batch of samples processed (maximum 20), at least one method blank should be carried throughout the entire sample preparation and analytical process, as described in Chapter One. A method blank is prepared using the

3200 - 9 Revision 0

July 2005

same reagents and quantities used with samples and processed through the appropriate steps of the procedure with the samples. These steps may include, but are not limited to extraction, chromatographic separation, concentration, dilution, filtering, and analysis. If the method blank does not contain target analytes at a level that exceeds the project-

specific criteria requirements, then the method blank would be considered acceptable. In the absence of project-specific criteria, if the blank is less than the lower limit of

quantitation, less than 10% of the regulatory limit, or less than 10% of the lowest sample concentration, whichever is greater, then the method blank is considered acceptable. If the method blank cannot be considered acceptable, the method blank should be re-analyzed at once, and if still unacceptable, then all samples after the last acceptable

method blank must be re-prepared and re-analyzed along with the other appropriate batch of QC samples. These blanks will be useful in determining if samples are being

contaminated. If the method blank exceeds the criteria, but the samples are all either

below the reporting level or below the applicable action level or other criteria, then the data should not be rejected based on this analysis.

9.4.2 Duplicate: For each batch of samples processed (maximum 20), at least one duplicate sample should be analyzed. A duplicate is a replicate sample aliquot carried through the same sample preparation and analysis process as the original sample. A duplicate is used to document method precision in a given sample matrix. Duplicate precision is determined via comparison of the relative percent difference (RPD) between the analysis result of the duplicate and that of the original sample. A duplicate sample should be prepared for each matrix type (i.e., sediment, soil, etc.). Acceptance criteria should be set at a laboratory-derived limit developed through the use of historical analyses per matrix type analyzed. In the absence of historical data, this limit should be set at an RPD of ≤ 25%.

9.4.3 Matrix spike (MS): For each batch of samples processed (maximum 20), at least one MS sample should be carried through the entire sample preparation and analytical process. An MS is an intralaboratory split sample spiked with a known

concentration of each analytical species of interest (see Secs. 7.19 and 7.20). An MS is used to document the accuracy of a method in a given sample matrix. MS samples should be spiked at the project-specific action level or, when lacking project-specific action levels, between the low- and mid-level calibration standards. Acceptance criteria should be set at a laboratory-derived limit developed through the use of historical analyses per matrix type analyzed. In the absence of historical data, the accuracy limit should be set at ±25% of the spiked concentration. A matrix spike sample should be included whenever a new matrix type is being analyzed.

9.4.4 LCS: An LCS should be included with each batch of samples processed (maximum 20). The LCS consists of an aliquot of a clean (control) matrix similar to the sample matrix and of the same weight. The LCS is spiked with the same analytes as the matrix spike, when appropriate. When the results of the matrix spike analysis indicate a potential problem due to the sample matrix itself, the LCS results may be used to verify that the laboratory can perform the analysis in a clean matrix.

reference material (RM) may be used in place of an LCS. The SRM, CRM or RM generally consists of a commercially-prepared, well characterized matrix similar to the sample matrix and containing the analytical species of interest at established reference concentration levels.

3200 - 10 Revision 0

July 2005

10.0 CALIBRATION AND STANDARDIZATION

The laboratory microwave system should be calibrated to measure within ±2 °C. Consult the manufacturer’s instructions for microwave system calibration.

11.0 PROCEDURE

11.1 The specific procedures that are applied to the sample depend on the extent of the mercury speciation information that is required.

11.1.1 If only total mercury data are required, then analyze the sample using Method 7473 or other suitable procedures, or sum the results for the extractable and non-extractable mercury fractions from Sec. 11.8.

11.1.2 If extractable mercury data are required, then proceed to Sec. 11.2 for the mercury extraction procedures and use either the microwave-assisted extraction

procedure (Sec. 11.2.1) or the ultrasound-assisted extraction procedure (Sec. 11.2.2).

11.1.3 If non-extractable mercury data are required, then proceed to Sec. 11.2 for the mercury extraction procedures, but analyze the residual solids from the extraction procedure as stated in Sec. 11.2.1.5 or 11.2.2.8.

11.1.4 If data are required for extractable organic mercury, extractable inorganic mercury, or both fractions, proceed to Sec. 11.2 for the extraction procedures and then to Sec. 11.4 for the separation and concentration of the extractable mercury by solid-phase extraction, followed by Sec. 11.5 for the sub-speciation of the extractable organic and extractable inorganic mercury fractions.

11.1.5 If data for individual extractable mercury species are required, proceed to Sec. 11.2 for the extraction procedures and then to Sec. 11.6 for the sub-speciation of the individual extractable mercury species by HPLC or appropriate hyphenated technique (see Sec. 11.8).

11.1.6 If data are required for semi-mobile mercury, non-mobile mercury, or both fractions, proceed to Sec. 11.2 for the mercury extraction procedures. Then, process the residual solids generated in Sec. 11.2 through the separation and extraction procedures in Sec. 11.7 for the sub-speciation of the semi-mobile and non-mobile mercury.

11.1.7 For some projects, it may be appropriate or required to report the results of the mercury speciation analyses relative to the dry weight of the original sample. The calculation of the dry weight of the sample is described in Sec. 12.1.

11.2 Extractable mercury

11.2.1 Microwave-assisted extraction

This extraction involves the use of a solution of 4.0 M HNO3 to extract mercury species from soil or sediment samples (Ref. 17-19).

11.2.1.1 Weigh 1.0 ± 0.2 g of homogenized soil or sediment sample

into microwave extraction vessels.

3200 - 11 Revision 0

July 2005

11.2.1.2 Add 10.0 mL of 4.0 M HNO3 to each sample. Add a magnetic stirring bar to each vessel for thorough mixing of solvent with the sample. 11.2.1.3 Seal microwave vessels and irradiate at 100 °C for 10 min with

magnetic stirring on. A 2-min ramping time should be used to reach the desired

temperature of 100 °C.

loading of the system. The extraction time of 10 min should be maintained

independently of the ramping time.

11.2.1.4 Let the vessels cool for safe handling, and then filter the

extracts through a 0.22 μm glass fiber filter. Store extracts in the cold at 4 °C until analysis (within 5 days). This extract contains the extractable mercury species and can be analyzed directly, concentrated and then analyzed or divided for further

processing. See Sec. 11.8 for analysis, Sec. 11.4 for separation and concentration and Sec. 11.5 for further speciation.

11.2.1.5 The residual solids may be saved for the direct analysis of the non-extractable mercury by Method 7473 or may be further extracted as semi-

mobile and non-mobile mercury species. See Sec. 11.8 for analysis and Sec. 11.3 and 11.7 for further speciation.

11.2.2 Ultrasound-assisted extraction

This extraction involves the use of a solution of 2.0% HCl + 10% ethanol to extract mercury species from solid or sediment samples.

11.2.2.1 Weigh 1.5 ± 0.5 g of sample into a centrifuge tube.

11.2.2.3 Vortex the samples for 1 min then centrifuge the samples for

1 min. Test the pH value of the supernatant. If the pH is greater than 3, add

concentrated HCl drop-wise, vortex, centrifuge, test pH. Repeat this step until the pH value of the supernatant is between 1.5 and 3. It is recommended to add a few drops (1 drop = 0.05 mL; not more than 5 drops) of concentrated acetate buffer

(0.2 M, pH 3.0) to the supernatant, before adding HCl, to achieve this pH with

minimal reagent addition.

11.2.2.4

60 ± 2 °C. Vortex the samples for 1 min. Sonicate samples for 7 min at 11.2.2.2 Add 2.5 mL of 2.0% HCl + 10% ethanol extraction solvent to each sample. Make sure each tube is properly sealed.

11.2.2.7 Add 2.5 mL of reagent water to the sample residue. Vortex

the samples for 1 min, and then centrifuge the samples for 1 min. Combine the

water rinse with extraction supernatants from 11.2.2.6. This

3200 - 12 Revision 0

July 2005 11.2.2.6 Repeat the extraction (Secs. 11.2.2.2, 11.2.2.4 and 11.2.2.5) three more times. Additional pH adjustment (Sec. 11.2.2.3) is not necessary. Combine all collected extraction supernatants into the same vessel. 11.2.2.5 Centrifuge the samples for 5 min at 3100 ± 100 rpm. Decant the supernatant into an appropriate container.

combined solution contains the extractable mercury species and can be analyzed

directly, concentrated and then analyzed, or divided for further processing. See

Sec. 11.8 for analysis, Sec. 11.4 for separation and concentration and Sec. 11.5

for further speciation.

11.2.2.8 The residual solids may be saved for the direct analysis of the

non-extractable mercury by Method 7473 or further extracted as semi-mobile

mercury species and non-mobile mercury species. See Sec. 11.8 for analysis and

Secs. 11.3 and 11.7 for further speciation.

Further speciation of extractable mercury and non-extractable mercury

Determine if the extractable mercury fraction is to be divided into organic and inorganic fractions or into individual mercury species. To concentrate the extractable mercury fraction and/or separate it into inorganic and organic mercury fractions, proceed to Sec. 11.4. To

separate the extractable mercury fraction into individual mercury species, proceed to Sec. 11.6. To separate the non-extractable mercury fraction into semi-mobile and non-mobile mercury fractions, proceed to Sec. 11.7.

Sub-speciation by alternative techniques, such as GC-MS or chelation resins, may also be appropriate, provided that adequate performance can be demonstrated.

11.4 Isolation of extractable mercury by solid-phase extraction

This procedure is appropriate for the separation and concentration of the extractable mercury fraction using solid-phase extraction. Adequate separation has been achieved using SCF as the solid-phase extraction medium (Ref. 7, 16, 17, 20-22). The medium is commercially available (Ref. 14) or can be prepared in house following the procedure described below.

11.4.1 Prepare a mixture containing 50 mL of mercaptoacetic acid, 35 mL of acetic anhydride, 16 mL of acetic acid, 0.15 mL of sulfuric acid and 5 mL of reagent water in a clean vessel. Immerse a 15-g portion of cotton fiber in this mixture. Cover the vessel and place it in a constant temperature apparatus capable of maintaining a temperature of 40 ± 2 °C for four days. Remove the cotton fiber from the reagent mixture and place it in a filter funnel (or alternative vacuum filtration device) and rinse with reagent water until the pH of the washings is neutral. Dry the cotton fiber (now "SCF") at 40 ± 2 °C for two days. Store the SCF in cold location at 4 °C or in a refrigerator in a dark bottle wrapped with aluminum foil. The SCF product is stable for at least 3-4 months (Ref. 21). Alternatively, purchase SCF solid phase columns commercially.

11.4.2 Place a PTFE frit at the bottom of an appropriate size column. Add a 0.2-g portion of the SCF, along with 3 mL of water. Place a second PTFE frit on the top of the SCF. Apply pressure to the top frit to compact the SCF into a homogeneous disk between the two frits.

solid-phase material. For example, in a column with an internal diameter of

1.1 cm, the height of the disk is about 1.4 cm. Higher capacity can be achieved by

using more SCF; however the reagents for separation and fractionation should be

proportionally increased.

11.3

3200 - 13 Revision 0

July 2005

be performed and the SCF disks should be prepared with care to avoid

channeling. If using commercially available SCF disks, then same day packing is

not required.

11.4.3 Just prior to use condition the SCF disk by passing 10 mL of reagent water, then 10 mL of 6 M HCl and finally 15 mL of reagent water sequentially through the medium using a flow rate of 1 mL/min.

conditioning, the SCF media must be used within 30 min.

11.4.4 Adjust the pH of the extract from Sec. 11.2.1.7 or Sec. 11.2.2.4 of the extraction procedure to pH = 6 ± 1 with 10 M NaOH. Filter the solution to retain the

particles whose sizes are larger than 1.0 μm. Rinse the retained particles with 3 mL 0.1% HCl. Combine the filtered solution with the rinse solution.

3+ in the extracted solution will degrade the

retention and separation ability of the SCF media. It may also induce the

transformation from alkyl mercury to inorganic mercury under acidic condition.

After adjusting the pH to 6 ± 1, the precipitation of Fe(OH)3 is achieved. 1.0-μm

filtration will minimize the presence of Fe3+ in the solution before it is passed

through the SCF column. The 0.1% (v/v) HCl rinse will minimize the loss of Hg

species of interest during the filtration procedure (Ref. 7).

4OH for pH adjustment because

NH4OH may precipitate out Hg2+.

11.4.5 Adjust the pH of the filtered solution to pH = 3 ± 1 with 6 M HCl and pass through the SCF column using a flow rate of ≤1 mL/min.

11.4.6 If only the extractable mercury fraction is of interest, remove the SCF disk from the column and analyze it directly using an appropriate determinative method such as Method 7473 (Ref. 7, 23) to determine the amount of extractable mercury.

11.4.7 Alternatively, the concentrated extractable mercury fraction can be further separated into extractable inorganic mercury and extractable organic mercury fractions. If such separation is needed, proceed to 11.5.

11.5 Sub-speciation of inorganic and organic extractable mercury

11.5.1 Elute the organic mercury species from the SCF solid phase extraction medium by passing 8 mL of eluent 1 (see Sec. 7.5.2.1) through the SCF column at a flow rate of ≤1 mL/min, followed by 2 mL of water. This eluent is analyzed using an

appropriate determinative method to determine the amount of organomercury that has been extracted from the sample. See Sec. 11.8 for details.

11.5.2 The extractable inorganic mercury fraction will remain on the SCF and may be analyzed by an appropriate mercury detection method, either by direct analysis of the solid SCF medium or by appropriate dissolution of the medium and subsequent analysis. See Sec. 11.8 for details.

3200 - 14 Revision 0

July 2005

11.5.3 As another option, the remaining inorganic mercury fraction can also be eluted from the SCF medium by passing 8 mL of eluent 2 (see Sec. 7.5.2.2) through the SCF column at a flow rate of ≤1 mL/min, followed by 2 mL of water. This eluent is analyzed using an appropriate determinative method to determine the amount of

inorganic mercury that has been extracted from the sample. See Sec. 11.8 for details.

11.6 Sub-speciation of extractable mercury by HPLC

This procedure is appropriate for the separation of the extractable mercury fraction into individual mercury species: HgCl2, Hg(OH)2, Hg(NO3)2, HgSO4, HgO, Hg2+ complexes as Hg2+ ion, and CH3Hg+ and CH3CH2Hg+ ions.

11.6.1 Adequate separation has been achieved by HPLC using a 30 cm x 4.0 mm, 5-μm pore size C-18 column and a mobile phase containing 30:70 methanol:H2O, 0.005% 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.6 M ammonium acetate (Ref. 9, 10).

11.6.2 To ensure compatibility with the HPLC column, adjust the pH of the

extract from either Sec. 11.2.1.4 or Sec. 11.2.2.7 or Sec. 11.5.1 or Sec. 11.5.3 to a value in the range of 3 to 7. Dilute samples to an appropriate volume using reagent water. species may precipitate when the pH is raised.

11.6.3 A precipitate formation due to the pH adjustment step may interfere with the separation or the detection method, in which case it may be necessary to filter the sample. Refer to Sec. 11.4.4

11.6.4 If the presence of a large amount of inorganic mercury interferes or

masks the organic mercury peak then the SCF separation described in Sec. 11.4 can be used to eliminate this problem.

11.6.5 Refer to Method 8000 for additional information on HPLC analysis, Method 6800 for speciated isotope dilution, and other appropriate analytical detection methods.

11.7 Sub-speciation of non-extractable mercury

If needed, the remaining matrix material from Sec. 11.2.1.8 or Sec. 11.2.2.5 may be further divided as semi-mobile and non-mobile mercury fractions.

Sub-speciation of non-extractable mercury by alternative techniques, such as

Method 3052 or other acid leaching and digestion procedure (Ref. 13, 24-26), may also be appropriate.

11.7.1 Semi-mobile mercury species

11.7.1.1 Add 5 mL reagent water to the remaining sample portion from Sec. 11.2.1.5 or Sec. 11.2.2.8. Vortex the sample continuously for 1 min.

11.7.1.2 Sonicate the sample for 1 min at 60 ± 2 °C.

11.7.1.3 Centrifuge the mixture for 5 min at 3200 rpm. Transfer the

supernatant to a container.

3200 - 15 Revision 0

July 2005

11.7.1.4 Test the supernatant for chloride ions by adding 2-3 drops of

chloride ion test solution (Sec. 7.12). Formation of a white precipitate or white

turbidity indicates the presence of chloride ions.

11.7.1.5 Repeat the steps in Secs. 11.7.1.1-11.7.1.4 until the decanted supernatant is free of chloride ions. After testing for the presence of the chloride

ion the supernatant should be discarded.

extraction of both semi-mobile and non-mobile mercury species in the

same extraction step.

11.7.1.6 Add 5.0 mL of 1:2 (v/v) HNO3 extraction solution to the

remaining soil sample portion from 11.7.1.3. Make sure each vessel is properly

sealed. Vortex the sample for 1 min.

11.7.1.7 Heat the mixture for 20 min at 95 ± 2 °C in a heating device

described in Sec. 6.3.

heating, unless the vessel is pressurizable.

11.7.1.8 Centrifuge the extracted mixture for 5 min. Transfer the

supernatant to an appropriate container.

11.7.1.9 Repeat the steps in Secs. 11.7.1.6-11.7.1.8 once more.

Combine all collected extraction supernatants in the same vessel.

11.7.1.10 Add 5.0 mL of reagent water to the remaining soil sample

portion. Vortex the sample for 1 min and then centrifuge for 5 min. Decant and

combine the rinse water with the extract supernatants. This solution contains the

semi-mobile mercury species and can be analyzed by an appropriate mercury

detection method. See Sec. 11.8 for details.

11.7.2.1

11.7.2.2

11.7.2.3 Add 5.0 mL of 1:6:7 (v/v) HCl:HNO3:reagent water extraction

solution (Sec. 7.11) to the residual soil sample portion from 11.7.1.11. Make sure each vessel is properly sealed. Vortex the sample for 1 min.

11.7.2.4 Heat the mixture for 20 min at 95 ± 2 °C in a heating device

described in Sec. 6.3. Alternatively, perform the following extraction (Secs. 11.7.2.3-11.7.2.7) and analyze the extract by appropriate means (Sec. 11.8). Analyze the solids from 11.7.1.11 directly for non-mobile mercury species (Sec. 11.8). 11.7.2 Non-mobile mercury species 11.7.1.11 The residual solids may be saved for the analysis of the non-mobile mercury species.

3200 - 16 Revision 0

July 2005

heating, unless the vessel is pressurizable.

11.7.2.5 Centrifuge the extracted mixture for 5 min. Transfer the

supernatant to an appropriate container.

11.7.2.6 Repeat the steps in Secs. 11.7.2.3-11.7.2.5 once more.

Combine all collected extraction supernatants into the same vessel.

11.7.2.7 Add 5.0 mL of reagent water to the remaining soil sample

portion. Vortex the sample for 1 min and then centrifuge for 5 min. Decant and

combine the rinse water with the extract supernatants from Sec. 11.7.2.6. This

solution contains the non-mobile mercury species and can be analyzed by an

appropriate mercury detection method. See Sec. 11.8 for details.

11.8 Analysis of specific mercury fractions

Many mercury detection techniques are appropriate detection techniques, such as Method 7473, 1631, 7470, 7471, 6020 and 6800. Other mercury detection techniques may also be appropriate, provided that adequate performance can be demonstrated.

11.8.1 Extractable mercury - Analyze the extractable mercury fraction from Sec. 11.2.1.4, 11.2.2.7 or 11.4.6 using an appropriate detection technique.

extraction procedure in Sec. 11.4 can be used for this purpose.

11.8.2 Extractable organic mercury - Analyze the eluent from Sec. 11.5.1 by an appropriate detection technique. Alternatively, sum the individual organic species

determined in Sec. 11.6.

11.8.3 Extractable inorganic mercury - Analyze the SCF disk from Sec. 11.5.2 directly by Method 7473. Alternatively, analyze the eluent from Sec. 11.5.3 by an

appropriate analytical detection technique. As another alternative, analyze either of the sample aliquots from Sec. 11.2.1.4, 11.2.2.7 or 11.5.3 by quantitating the inorganic peak as described in Sec. 11.6.

11.8.4 Non-extractable mercury - Analyze the remaining solids from Sec.

11.2.1.5 or 11.2.2.8 directly by Method 7473 or by suitable decomposition such as Method 3052 and appropriate analysis procedures. Alternatively, determine the non-extractable mercury as the difference between the total mercury concentration (Sec. 11.8.5) and the extractable mercury concentration (Sec. 11.8.1).

11.8.5 Total mercury - Analyze the unaltered sample by Method 7473 or by suitable decomposition such as Method 3052 and appropriate analysis procedures.

Alternatively, sum the results from Secs. 11.8.1 and 11.8.4.

11.8.6 Semi-mobile mercury – Analyze the extracted mercury fraction or a

portion thereof from Sec. 11.7.1.10 using an appropriate detection technique.

11.8.7 Non-mobile mercury – Analyze the remaining solids from Sec. 11.7.1.11 directly by Method 7473 or by other suitable decomposition such as Method 3052 and

appropriate analysis procedures. Alternatively, analyze the extracted mercury fraction or a portion thereof from Sec. 11.7.2.7 using an appropriate detection technique (Ref. 13, 23).

3200 - 17 Revision 0

July 2005

12.0 DATA ANALYSIS AND CALCULATIONS

12.1 If appropriate for the specific project, calculate the sample dry weight fraction as follows:

Dry Wt. Fraction=W2?W3 W1?W3

where:

W1 = Weight of sample + vessel before drying, in g

W2 = Weight of sample + vessel after drying, in g

W3 = Weight of empty, dry vessel, in g

12.2 The results of the analyses of the various mercury fractions can be converted to the concentration of the fraction in the solid sample as follows:

Sample Concentration=C×V×D W×S

where:

C = Concentration in the extract in mg/L

V = Volume of the extract in mL

D = Dilution factor from the analysis of the extract, if any

W = Wet weight of original sample aliquot that was extracted, in g

S = Dry-weight fraction of the sample, g/g (if dry-weight reporting is required)

The factors of 1000 in the numerator and the denominator convert mL to L and g to kg, effectively canceling each other out.

13.0 METHOD PERFORMANCE

13.1 Performance data and related information are provided in SW-846 methods only as examples and guidance. The data do not represent required performance criteria for users of the methods. Instead, performance criteria should be developed on a project-specific basis, and the laboratory should establish in-house QC performance criteria for the application of this method.

13.2 The extractability of pure mercury species are summarized in Table 1 (Ref. 7). These data are provided for guidance purposes only.

13.3 The 2.0% HCl + 10% ethanol extraction procedure was evaluated by spiking natural matrices (mercury species spiked at 25 μg mercury per 1 g of sample). The natural matrices selected for spiking were silica (SiO2), NIST SRM 2709 (San Joaquin Soil), and two soil matrices. The samples were analyzed by EPA Method 7473 and HPLC-ICP-MS. The results are summarized in Tables 2 to 5. The "extractable" mercury fraction in 2.0% HCl + 10% ethanol extraction is compared with Method 1311 (TCLP) by using BCR 580 and SRM 2709. The results are summarized in Table 6. These data are provided for guidance purposes only.

3200 - 18 Revision 0

July 2005

13.4 The SCF solid-phase extraction was optimized. The optimal amount of SCF

packed in column was determined to be 0.2 g with a bed volume of 0.7 mL/0.1 g SCF. The best pH range was 3 ± 1. The optimal flow rate was 1.0 mL/min. The optimal eluent 1 was a 1.0 M HCl + 1.0 M NaCl solution which minimizes the inorganic mercury interference on the organic mercury measurement. The optimal eluent 2 was a solution of 6 M HCl, saturated NaCl and 0.1% CuCl2?2H2O. The overall performance of SCF solid-phase extraction procedure is

summarized in Table 7. See Ref. 7 for details. These data are provided for guidance purposes only.

13.5 This method was validated with Institute for Reference Materials and

Measurements (IRMM) reference material BCR 580. The results are summarized in Table 8. The samples were analyzed by EPA Method 7473 and HPLC-ICP-MS (Ref. 7). These data are provided for guidance purposes only.

13.6 The microwave-assisted extraction method was validated with two specifically prepared reference soil materials, three National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standard reference materials (SRM 1941a, SRM 2704 and SRM 2709) and one IRMM reference material (BCR 580). The samples were analyzed by EPA Method 7473 and HPLC-ICP-MS. The results are summarized in Table 9 (Ref. 17, 18). These data are provided for guidance purposes only.

13.7 The microwave-assisted extraction method was also validated by using EPA Method 6800. These results indicate that, based on the matrices tested, the Method 3200 protocol does not induce any transformation from methylmercury to inorganic mercury or vice versa. The results are summarized in Table 10. See Ref. 17, 18. These data are provided for guidance purposes only.

14.0 POLLUTION PREVENTION

14.1 Pollution prevention encompasses any technique that reduces or eliminates the quantity and/or toxicity of waste at the point of generation. Numerous opportunities for pollution prevention exist in laboratory operations. The EPA has established a preferred hierarchy of environmental management techniques that places pollution prevention as the management option of first choice. Whenever feasible, laboratory personnel should use pollution prevention techniques to address their waste generation. When wastes cannot be feasibly reduced at the source, the Agency recommends recycling as the next best option.

14.2 For information about pollution prevention that may be applicable to laboratories and research institutions, consult Less is Better: Laboratory Chemical Management for Waste Reduction available from the American Chemical Society's Department of Government

Relations and Science Policy, 1155 16th St., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036, .

15.0 WASTE MANAGEMENT

15.1 The Environmental Protection Agency requires that laboratory waste management practices be conducted consistent with all applicable rules and regulations. The Agency urges laboratories to protect the air, water, and land by minimizing and controlling all releases from hoods and bench operations, complying with the letter and spirit of any sewer discharge permits and regulations, and by complying with all solid and hazardous waste regulations, particularly the hazardous waste identification rules and land disposal restrictions. For further information on waste management, consult The Waste Management Manual for Laboratory Personnel available from the American Chemical Society at the address listed in Sec. 14.2.

3200 - 19 Revision 0

July 2005

15.2 All inorganic mercury and organomercury waste should be stored separately in dedicated glass bottles. The waste bottles should be kept in a hood or ventilated area in

containers with absorbent pads. Gloves, pipette tips, etc which might have come in contact with mercury containing compounds should be disposed off in a dedicated waste with a tight lid.

16.0 REFERENCES

1.

2.

3. Bloom, N. S.; Gill, G. A.; Cappellino, S.; Dobbs, C.; McShea, L.; Driscoll, C.; Mason, R.; Rudd, J., "Speciation and Cycling of Mercury in Lavaca Bay, Texas, Sediments." Environ. Sci. Technol., 1999, 33, (1), 7-13. Templeton, D.; Ariese, F.; Cornelis, R.; Danielsson, L. G.; Muntau, H.; van Leeuvan, H. P.;

Lobinski, R., "Guidelines for terms related to chemical speciation and fractionation of elements: Definitions, structural aspects, and methodological approaches." Pure Appl. Chem., 2000, 72, (8), 1453-1470.

Hintelmann, H.; Falter, R.; Ilgen, G.; Evans R. D., "Determination of Artifactual Formation of

Monomethylmercury (CH3Hg+) in Environmental Samples Using Stable Hg2+ Isotopes with ICP-MS Detection: Calculation of Contents Applying Species Specific Isotope Additions." Fresenius J. Anal. Chem., 1997, 358, (3), 363-370.

Bloom, N. S.; Coleman, J. A.; Barber, L., "Artifact formation of methyl mercury during aqueous distillation and alternative techniques for the extraction of methyl mercury from environmental

samples." Fresenius J. Anal. Chem., 1997, 358, (3), 371-377.

Rahman, G. M. M.; Kingston, H. M. S.; Bhandari, S., "Synthesis and Characterization of Isotopically Enriched Methylmercury (CH3201Hg+)." Appl. Organomet. Chem., 2003, 17, (12), 913-920.

Han, Y.; Kingston, H. M.; Boylan, H. M.; Rahman, G. M. M.; Shah, S.; Richter, R. C.; Link, D. D.; Bhandari, S., "Speciation of mercury in soil and sediment by selective solvent and acid extraction." Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2003, 375, (3), 428-436.

Huo, D.; Kingston, H. M. S.; Larget, B., "Application of Isotope Dilution in Elemental Speciation: York, 2000; 277-313.

Rahman, G. M. M.; Kingston, H. M. S., "Application of Speciated Isotope Dilution Mass

Spectrometry to Evaluate Extraction Methods for Determining Mercury Speciation in Soils and Sediments." Anal. Chem., 2004, 76, (13), 3548-3555.

Rahman, G. M. M.; Kingston, H. M. S.; Kern, J. C.; Hartwell, S. W.; Anderson, R. F.; Yang, S. -Y., "Inter-laboratory Validation of EPA Method 3200 for Mercury Speciation Analysis using Prepared Soil Reference Materials." Appl. Organomet. Chem., 2005, 19, 301-307.

Occupational Safety and Health Adminstration, Washington, D.C., 1978.

Nierenberg, D. W.; Nordgren, R. E.; Chang, M. B.; Siegler, R. W.; Blayney, M. B.; Hochberg, F.; Toribara, T. Y.; Cernichiari, E.; Clarkson, T., "Delayed Cerebellar Disease and Death after

Accidental Exposure to Dimethylmercury." New Engl. J. Med., 1993, 338, 1672-1675.

4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 3200 - 20 Revision 0

July 2005

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19. Applied Isotope Technologies, Inc., , e-mail: info@sidms.com. Kingston, H. M. Speciated Isotope Dilution Mass Spectrometry of Reactive Species and Related Methods. US Patent 6 790 673 B1, September 14, 2004. Jain, W.; McLeod, C. W., "Rapid Sequential Determination of Inorganic Mercury and Methylmercury in Natural Waters by Flow-injection - Cold Vapor-Atomic-Fluorescence Spectrometry." Talanta, 1992, 39, (11), 1537-1542. Rahman, G. M. M.; Kingston, H. M. S., "Development of Microwave-Assisted Extraction Method and Isotopic Validation of Mercury Species in Soils and Sediments." J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2005, 20, 183-191. Rahman, G. M. M. "Development, Research and Validation of Environmental Speciation Methods: Evaluation by Speciated Isotope Dilution Mass Spectrometry in Mercury and Chromium Speciation Analysis." Ph. D. Dissertation, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, 2004. Fischer, E.; Tu, Q.; Nagourney, S.; England, R.; Buckley, B. "Microwave-assisted Solvent

Extraction for Quantitative Simultaneous Extraction of Inorganic Mercury and Methylmercury from Soils." 20th Annual National Environmental Monitoring Conference, Washington, DC, July 19-23, 2004; Washington, DC, July 19-23, 2004.

Jain, W.; McLeod, C. W., "Field Sampling Technique for Mercury Speciation." Anal. Proc., 1991, 293-294.

Lee, Y. H.; Mowrer, J., "Determination of Methylmercury in Natural Waters at the Sub-nanograms-per-litre Level by Capillary Gas Chromatography after Adsorbent Pre-concentration." Anal. Chim. Acta, 1989, 221, (2), 259-268.

Mena, M. L.; McLeod, C. W., "Mercury Species Immobilized on Sulphydryl Cotton: A New

Candidate Reference Material for Mercury Speciation." Mikrochim. Acta., 1996, 123, (1-4), 103-108. Boylan, H. M.; Richter, R. C.; Kingston, H. M.; Ricotta, A. C., "Rapid Analysis for the Field: Method Development and Application to Natural Gas Utility Sites." Water Air Soil Poll., 2001, 127, (1-4), 255-270.

Davis, A. Bloom, N. S.; Hee, Q.; Shane, S., "The Environmental Geochemistry and Bioaccessibility of Mercury in Soils and Sediments-A Review." Risk Anal., 1997, 17, (5), 105-113.

Revis, N. W.; Osborne, T. R.; Holdworth, G.; Hadden, C., "Distribution of Mercury Species in Soil from a Mercury-Contaminated Site." Water Air Soil Poll., 1989, 17, (5), 557-569.

Revis, N. W.; Osborne, T. R.; Sedgely, D.; King, A., "Quantitative Method for Determining the Concentration of Mercury (II) Sulphide in Soils and Sediments." Analyst, 1989, 114, 823-826. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. . 25. 26.

17.0 TABLES, DIAGRAMS, FLOWCHARTS, AND VALIDATION DATA

The following pages contain the tables, and figures referenced by this method.

3200 - 21 Revision 0

July 2005

TABLE 1 EXTRACTABILITY OF MERCURY SPECIESSpecies*Operationallydefined Mercury Fraction Extractable Organic Extractable Inorganic Semi-mobile Non-mobileCH3HgCl C2H5HgCl HgCl2 HgO Hg HgS Hg2Cl22.0% HCl + 10% Ethanol; 60 °C and sonication for 30 min 98 96 96 97 4 0.15 1.6Extractability (%) 1:2 HNO3: reagent water; 95 °C for 40 min 99 94 99 97 95 0.04 111:6:7 HCl:HNO3: reagent water; 95 °C for 40 min 104 93 99 102 102 97 96*10 mg of each pure mercury species in each 10-mL extract solutionsData obtained from Ref. 7TABLE 2 RECOVERIES OF EXTRACTABLE MERCURY SPECIES SPIKED INTO A SILICA MATRIXMercury spiked species HgCl2 CH3HgCl C2H5HgCl HgO*95% confidence level, n = 3.Recovery range* (%) HPLC-ICP-MS 96 ± 2 98 ± 6 95 ± 7 98 ± 4Data obtained from Ref. 73200 - 22Revision 0 July 2005

TABLE 3

RECOVERIES OF EXTRACTABLE MERCURY SPECIES

SPIKED INTO SRM 2709 SOIL MATRIX

Mercury spiked species

HgCl2 CH3HgCl C2H5HgCl

*95% confidence level, n=3

Recovery* (%) HPLC-ICP-MS

98 ± 7 92 ± 17 92 ± 17

Recovery* (%) Method 7473 Total extractable, 92 ± 9

Data obtained from Ref. 7

TABLE 4

RECOVERIES OF EXTRACTABLE MERCURY SPECIES SPIKED

INTO NATURAL SOIL MATRIX 1

Mercury spiked species

HgCl2 CH3HgCl C2H5HgCl HgO

*95% confidence interval with n = 3

Recovery* (%) HPLC-ICP-MS

106 ± 15 104 ± 10 92 ± 18 NA Recovery* (%) Method 7473

92.5 ± 0.5 95.5 ± 2.5 91.0 ± 3.0 93.0 ± 1.0

The soil matrix 1 was a soil collected from waste deposit field and sieved through 60-

mesh screen, then heated in a 240 °C oven for one week. The mercury residue in the soil matrix was less than 30 ng mercury per g of soil. Data obtained from Ref. 7

TABLE 5

RECOVERIES OF EXTRACTABLE MERCURY SPECIES SPIKED

INTO NATURAL SOIL MATRIX 2

Mercury spiked species

HgCl2CH3HgCl C2H5HgCl

Recovery* (%) HPLC-ICP-MS

12 ± 689 ± 12 95 ± 15

Recovery* (%) Method

7473

Total extractable, 62 ± 8

*95% confidence interval, n=3

The low recovery of the HgCl2 is probably due to complexing of the Hg2+ with components of the sample matrix.

Data obtained from Ref. 7

3200 - 23 Revision 0

July 2005

TABLE 6

COMPARISON OF 2.0%HCl+10% ETHANOL EXTRACTION WITH METHOD 1311 (TCLP)

FOR EXTRACTABLE MERCURY SPECIES

Reference Material 2.0% HCl + 10% Ethanol extractiona Method 1311b BCR 5801.4 ± 0.4 ppm 3 ± 2 ppbSRM 2709 40 ± 8 ppb 12 ± 9 ppb

a95% confidence interval, n=3.

bMethod 1311 was scaled down to a 1-gram sample size

Data obtained from Ref. 7

TABLE 7

RECOVERIES OF EXTRACTABLE MERCURY SPECIES

AFTER SCF SOLID-PHASE EXTRACTION

Eluent

Pass-through (10% Ethanol) 1.0 M HCl + 1.0 M NaCl

6 M HCl + saturated NaCl + 0.1% CuCl2?2H2O

Residue (in SCF)

DL = detection limit (0.01 ng)

CHHgCl <0.5%96% <3% <DL

CHHgCl <0.599% <3% <DL

HgCl <0.5%<0.1% 98% <DL

Data obtained from Ref. 7

TABLE 8

VALIDATION OF THE METHOD USING BCR 580

Method or

(Certified Value) HPLC-ICP-MS SCF-Method 7473 (Certified Value)

Methyl Mercury as Mercury (ppb) 73.6 ± 6.3 78 ± 27b 70.2 ± 3.4

Extractable Inorganic Mercury

(ppm) 1.4 ± 0.4 0.9 ± 0.3b NA

Non-extractable Mercury (ppm) 133 ± 9.6 127 ± 7b NA

Total Mercury

(ppm) 134.5 ± 9.6 128 ± 7c 132 ± 3

a95% confidence interval with n = 6 b95% confidence interval with n = 3 c95% confidence interval with n = 3 NA = not analyzed

Data obtained from Ref. 7

3200 - 24 Revision 0

July 2005

TABLE 9

VALIDATION OF MICROWAVE-ASSISTED EXTRACTION METHOD

Method HPLC-ICP-MS 7473 (direct (μg/g)

analysis)

(μg/g) Hg CHHg Total Hg CHHg Total

Material-1

Inorganic Mercury 4.0 ---- ND 4.08 ± 0.16 4.26 ± 0.17 4.26 ± 0.17

Organic Mercury ---- 4.0 ND 3.58 ± 0.27 3.81 ± 0.20 3.81 ± 0.20

Mixed Mercury 3.0 3.0 5.73 ± 0.58 3.02 ± 0.06 2.66 ± 0.07 5.68 ± 0.09

Material-2

Inorganic Mercury 6.0 ---- ND 6.73 ± 1.04 6.06 ± 0.56 6.06 ± 0.56

Organic Mercury ---- 6.0 ND 5.44 ± 0.62 5.94 ± 0.52 5.94 ± 0.52

Standard Reference Materials

SRM 1941a ---- ND 0.5 ± 0.2 0.61 ± 0.02 0.67 ± 0.06 0.67 ± 0.06

SRM 2704 ---- ND 1.44 ± 0.07 1.51 ± 0.05 1.40 ± .08 1.40 ± 0.08

SRM 2709 ---- ND 1.40 ± 0.08 1.46 ± 0.03 1.28 ± 0.12 1.28 ± 0.12

ND = not detectable (ND = 0.05 ng)

Uncertainties are expressed at the 95% confidence level with n = 3.

Material-1: 100% processed topsoil; and Material-2: a mixture of 75% processed topsoil and 25% Ottawa sand Sample Certified / ‘Made-to’ Value (μg/g)

Data obtained from Ref. 17, 18.

TABLE 10

THE DECONVOLUTED CONCENTRATION AND TRANSFORMATION OF MERCURY

SPECIES IN MATERIAL-1 USING SIDMS CALCULATIONS.

Deconvoluted Concentration Interconversion Hg CH3Hg Hg to CH3Hg CH3Hg to Hg (μg/g) (μg/g) (%) (%)

DSBE 3.05 ± 0.12 2.69 ± 0.10 1.3 ± 1.5 0.1 ± 1.4

DSAE 2.94 ± 0.07 2.62 ± 0.09 0.8 ± 1.5 0.7 ± 0.6

DSBE = double spiked before extraction. DSAE = double spiked after extraction.

Uncertainties are expressed at the 95% confidence level with n = 3

Data obtained from Ref. 17, 18.

3200 - 25 Revision 0

July 2005

FIGURE 1

METHYL MERCURY TRANSFORMATION

Solid line: A methyl mercury standard in acid solution before the addition of iron Dash line: A methyl mercury standard in acid solution with 500 ppm iron.

Figure taken from Ref. 7.

3200 - 26 Revision 0

July 2005

FIGURE 2

Solid line: An ethyl mercury standard in acid solution without the addition of iron Dash line: An ethyl mercury standard in acid solution with 500 ppm iron.

Figure taken from Ref. 7.

3200 - 27 Revision 0

July 2005

METHOD 3200

3200 - 28 Revision 0

July 2005