Scientists are doing experiments on live animals for the purpose of research
nowadays .Some people believe that this is not only cruel but also unnecessary; others think it is in the interest of mankind as a whole . Discuss
The first reason can be seen by every person is that results of experiments on some certain animals can help scientists. Scientists can determine whether these sorts of substance which are used in laboratory are feasible or not by analyzing the reaction of the animals. Sometimes, it is not only the best way but also the only approach due to danger of the experiments that could not occur on the human being.
The second reason for my propensity for the above statement is that the scientists can keep researching with different ways. It is flexible and economical for experts to do it, even though they fail to attain what they want. Furthermore, they may repeat process more easily.
However, on the other hand, we can not deny that some people want to reach their achievements by killing the animals cruelly. So
something has to be done to improve the technology and equipments in laboratory, meanwhile, to make sure these behaviors are legal. Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality continuously, students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on teachers. Others think the respect and discipline in the classroom will disappear. Which opinion do you prefer?
There are some major causes for it. In the first instance, the improvement of students is the final goal of education. Only by giving comment on teachers’ performance can let teachers know the process of students’ development clearly. Furthermore, the criticism is the stimulus to teachers’ self-perfection and improvement in educational quality. Last but not least, the criticism itself is a kind of feedback and communication between teachers and students, lack of which will affect the educational outcome afterwards.
If the students have courage to make comments on their teachers, they will have more confidence to conquer the difficulties in the future. As a Chinese proverb says,“the waves behind drive on those behind, so the new excels the
old.”Teachers will find their own disadvantage in the teaching to again and again.
Happiness is considered very important in our life. Why it is difficult to define? What factors are in achieving happiness?
In the first instance, true happiness comes from hard work. A student is very happy when he has gotten high score in his examinations. His
happiness is the result of his hard and patient study. Thus, happiness abounds in hard work. Secondly, happiness is rooted in optimistic attitude. In our daily life, we should face a lot of problems, which may lead to setbacks. If these defeatist sentiments seize us, happiness will be far away from us. The only way is right attitude and sparing no effort to overcome it then you can find happiness.
Last but not least, happiness comes from
frugality. Many example display people spending money wastefully for satisfaction of their
desires may suffer from poverty in the long run.
So living a simple and content life makes one happy and cheerful.
All in all, happiness is very important to our life. The good method to find happiness is making ou compare the advantages and disadvantages of book,film and tv In the first instance, books are a useful way of communication
information. A book is obviously conveniently portable. You can read book wherever you are and anything you want however, this form of communication information has some limitations. Movies are very popular nowadays even though since early last century they have begun to flourish and served as a form of
communication information. Films provide vivid pictures to audiences as a means of education. From movies we can learn much about place and its things that we are never able to visit. Films also improve our mental edification. Movies based upon novels help us to appreciate literature. However, Going to cinema entails extravagant cost and film audiences take no initiative.
I think among the three kinds of media, TV is the most effective medium for communication information. Firstly, TV is not only a convenient source of entertainment but also a comparatively cheap one. Secondly, TV also offers serious instructive programs. The most distant counties and strangest customs are brought right in your room. There are many arguments against TV. Flickering pictures are harmful to eyesight. Once people become addicted to TV, it will separate relationship among family members.
r mentality and physicality both strong. Pop stars’ high salary
For:
1. Their brilliant performances enrich people’s cultural life, which partly contributes to the spiritual civilization.
2. Some of these stars also have undergone painstaking training and practice. They may set an example for youngsters.
3. They sacrifice a lot for what they gain including privacy.
4. It is an inevitable outcome of the market economy. It is decided by the market.
Against:
1. We should value the talents who promote the welfare of society rather than these of pop stars.
2 Discourage/Strike the initiative and zeal of people in other fields who does.
3 They impose an adverse influence on the development of the next
generation, who may easily become money-oriented.
4 With the quickly-earned money the pop stars’ vanity may quickly expand and their souls may be distorted.
Creative artists should be given freedom to express their ideas (words, pictures, music and films. However some people think government should take some restriction with them. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give your reasons with own knowledge and give examples.
.
Creativity is the source of arts. The development of literature is a very vivid illustration. From Classicism to
Romanticism, from Renaissance to Realism, from Humanity to Post-modernism, all the styles of literature reflect people’s thinking and have epoch-making significance. Suppose there were only one style of literature, people would not appreciate so abundant poetry and novels and our world would become so monotonous.
A lot of countries have schools that focus only on the males or females. What are the advantages and disadvantages of unisexual schools?
Many sociologists and educationalists present their views on this issue from both sides. Those advocates of segregated schools argue that children from segregated schools have greater achievements academically and have greater self-confidence. Further, there are many more practical advantages in segregated schools such as administration. Adolescent problems can be dealt with better and more easily. Lastly in many countries, the most famous schools are segregated. It is a wonderful proof of their worth.
On the other side, those advocates of co-education point out that any discussion of this topic is bound to question the aims of education. One of the chief aims of education is equip future citizens with all they require to take their places in adult society which is made up of men and women. When segregated, boys and girls are made to feel that they are a race apart. Rivalry between the sexes is fostered. Anyone entering adult society after years of segregation can only be in for a shock. Segregated schools sometimes provide the right condition for sexual deviation and make children lack of healthy attitude to life that co-education encourages