2011英语专四作文范文（附阅卷老师讲评）

2011英专四级作文题目

Recently Government agencies in some big cities have been studying the possibility of “posing a pollution tax” on private cars. The amount of tax private car owners would have to pay would depend on the emission levels, i.e. engine or vehicle size. This has caused quite a stir among the public. Some regard it as an effective way to control the number of cars and reduce pollution in the city. But others don’t think so. What is your opinion?

Write a composition of about 200 words on the following topic:

Should private car owners be taxed for pollution?

范文一：9分作文

Should Private Car Owners be Taxed for Pollution?

Recently the government agencies in some big cities have been studying the possibility of putting a “pollution tax” on private cars. This has caused a great stir among the public. Some people hold the opinion that it is an effective way to control the number of cars and reduce the amount of pollution in the city, but others don’t think so. As far as I’m concerned, private car owners should be properly taxed for pollution.

The following two reasons are used to support my point of view. On one hand, as well known to us, our surrounding is seriously polluted especially by car pollution. Therefore, “pollution tax” on private car can effectively remind us of the severely pollution. Then the number of cars and pollution in the city can be reduced in some way. On the other hand, we know that we are facing the resource crisis. However, more private cars will use up more gas or other resources. So if we tax private car owners for pollution, we can decrease the use of resources and then protect the environment from pollution indirectly.

In conclusion, I think that private car owners should be properly taxed for pollution. It is not only for punishment but also for warning. “pollution tax” on private cars is an effective way to control the number of cars, reduce pollution and protect resources. From now on, as students, we should try our best to carry out it, such as going somewhere far away by bus, or other public transportations.

阅卷专家评论：

1. 审题基本准确；

2. 内容基本切题；

3.结构不够严谨；

4.论据缺乏说服力，论述不够充分；

5. 语言一般，不够流畅。

范文二：11.5分作文

Should Private Car Owners be Taxed for Pollution?

As the development of our society, more and more people buy private cars. And recently government agencies in some cities have been studying the possibility of putting a “pollution tax” on private cars, which has aroused quite a stir among the public. In my opinion, the private car owners should not be taxed for pollution, and I have three reasons for my opinion.

Firstly, I think the emission levels can’t decide how much pollution the car had made and how much money the owner should be taxed. For example, a car with a smaller engine maybe produce less pollution, but if the owner use it more frequently, of course it will produce more pollution. So the tax shouldn’t depend on the emission levels.

Secondly, the tax for pollution maybe more harmful to our environment. As you know, if a person pay some money for the pollution, he will think there is no responsibility for his car and there is no need for him to protect the environment, because he has already pay the money for the environment. Then he may pay little attention to the environment, and even harm the environment. So “pollution tax” maybe not be good for the environment.

Thirdly, protect the environment is the duty of every of us, not just several private car owners. If the government just force some private car owners to pay the “pollution tax”, the rest of us will think there is no duty for us to protect the environment. Then there will be more people to destroy the environment, and less people to protect the environment. Of course, the result of the “pollution tax” will be oppose to the original purpose of the government.

All in all, “pollution tax” is not good to our environment. And we should also remember that the duty of protect the environment is not just the duty of several private car owners, but the duty of everyone of us.

专家评论：

1. 审题准确到位；

2. 内容切题充实；

3. 观点清晰独到；

4. 结构严谨合理；

5. 有一些语言错误。

范文三：14分高分作文欣赏

Private Car Owners Should be Taxed for Pollution

It isn’t until recent years that the government elected out a scrappy win on cutting carbon dioxide emission, in which controlling the number of cars and advocating small-size vehicle have played an important role. Imposing “pollution tax” on private cars, without any doubt, will exert certain effect on controlling pollution, but only through a more refined and considerable scheme, can the policy thrive to its maximum power to realize the goals.

The first and foremost thing to consider is the volume of vehicle that belongs to government itself. As the government calls for taking public transportation rather than small vehicle, the “pollution tax” imposed on stated owned vehicles which is almost for personal use should be more severe than that on private vehicles. As long as the government creates the image of reducing pollution by constraining its volume of vehicle to nesserary level, will the public begin to lay emphasis on the reduction of vehicles and also environmental protection.

There is a further consideration that the tax should not only be judged by the engine or

vehicles’ sizes, simply because not everyone drives the same distance. In other words, the “pollution tax” will be enhanced through the collaboration with other forms of tax, like “oil tax”. The introduction of tax portfolio can make tax payment reasonable when the individual interest is safeguarded.

It is certain that “pollution tax” can contribute to the environment protection. However, the tax will not fully function unless a more considerate scheme of policies taken into account. 英语专业四级考试在线课堂

专家评论：

1. 观点新颖明确；

2. 内容切实到位；

3. 篇章结构清晰；

4.衔接自然合理；

5.语言流畅，词汇丰富，句式多变；

6.有一些语言错误。

牢记英专四级合格作文要求：

论点明确、清楚

论证层次分明

结构严谨

紧扣论点讨论分析，论证有说服力

观点阐述合乎逻辑

衔接自然、顺畅

语言运用得体

第二篇：20xx作文讲评课1