20xx年5月9日雅思大作文解析及范文
-朗阁名师Alice
5.9的雅思大作文终于考到环境类话题，考过试的烤鸭又要窃喜啦。话题不难但是需要注意的是对相应观点的思考，此题并未单纯考查环境问题，而是局限在了由于科技发展而引起的环境问题。
The development of technology causes environmental problems. Some people think people should choose a simpler way of life while others think we should use technology to solve the problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinions. 通过审题，我们不难发现，题目的背景信息已经告诉我们科技的发展确实引起了一些环境问题，所以有人认为人应该生活得更简单（通过减少对科技的使用来减少环境问题），另一个观点则认为科技可以用来解决这些问题。
我们在梳理思路的时候就要从这三方面入手：科技引起的环境问题；不依赖/使用科技会解决/减缓哪些环境问题；利用科技可以解决的环境问题。只要把科技和环境问题所相结合来想观点，就不会出现跑题或者偏题的情况啦。 下面是爱丽丝写的一篇范文供大家参考：
There is no doubt that science and technology has been contributing to social progress, along with adverse effects generated on environment. Hence, it is suggested by some that people should live simply with less use of technology. Others, however, believe it is the technology that can be utilized to tackle environmental issues.
Admittedly, due to people’s requirement of better and more convenient life, more technologies are invented and adopted, leading to some environmental issues. Therefore, it is reasonable to ask individuals to live a simpler life to reduce these problems. For example, before the Industrial Revolution, people travelled by carriages, riding horse or on feet. These simple travelling methods produced zero emissions and pollution generated after the invention of trains and automobiles with the use of fossil fuels. Consequently, if people drive less and ride more, fewer fumes are emitted and air quality is likely to be better. In this case, individuals’ changes on lifestyle seem more crucial.
On the other hand, advanced technology could effectively remedy environmental issues. For one thing, progressive technology can be used to reduce pollutions. In
terms of paper manufacturers, to reduce the industrial wastewater, some treatment equipment is installed to filter poisonous elements before draining into rivers. For another thing, we can create more environmental and recyclable products with the help of technology. Solar energy powered cars are typical examples, which enable people to transform sunlight into power, supplying energy for people’s daily life and production with less emissions of carbon dioxides.
From my perspective, changing lifestyle and innovating technology to deal with environmental issues are both necessary. Although some environmental problems are triggered under the introduction of technology, people cannot completely abandon current lifestyle. Making some changes such as riding instead of driving is easier, but we cannot refuse the use of cars needed for long distance travel. Therefore, innovating technology to facilitate people to make changes and reduce some corresponding problems seems more practical and reasonable.
第二篇：雅思9分满分大作文赏析
雅思9分满分大作文赏析
在雅思班，我惊喜的发现我教了十年雅思，居然碰到了难得一见的9分文章，我给了几位前任的IELTS Examiner打了分数，都给出了9分。我们来欣赏一下：
范文：
Globalization is a declarationof war upon all other cultures. And in culture wars, there is no exemption of civilians, there are no innocent bystanders. Why should it be expected that ancient and rooted civilizations are going to accept this peripheralisationwithout a struggle? The answer to that is that globalization carries an implicit promise that it will relieve poverty and offer security—perhaps the most ancient of human dreams. Because of the power of global capitalism to create wealth, it is assumed that this priority must sweep aside all other human preoccupations, including all existing institutions, interpretations and searches for meaning in the world.
It is disingenuous to assume that economy, society and culture operate in separate spheres. This suggests that, one, exposed to the globalizing imperative, no aspect of social life, customary practice, traditionalbehaviour will remain the same.
There have been, broadly, two principal responses in the world, which we may call the fatalistic and the resistant. It is significant that among the most fatalistic have been the leaders of G-7, Ex-President Clinton said globalization is a fact not a policy choice Tony Blair said it is inevitable and irreversible. It may be considered paradoxical that the leaders of the most dynamic and expanding economies in the world offer such a passive, unchallenging view of what are, after all, human-made arrangements. These are among the richest and most proactive regimes, which can wage endless war on the great abstraction, that is terror, topple regimes and lay down one WTO law for the poor and another for themselves. Is their helplessness in the presence of these mighty economic and cultural powers? There are two aspects to resistance. One is the reassertion of local identities—even if local actually means spread over very large parts of the world. The reclaiming of the local is often focused in the field of culture—music, songs and dance. This suggests an attempt to guaranteeit from the effects of economic integration; a kind of cordon sanitaria set up around a dwindling culture. Some people believe it is possible to get the best of both world—they accept the economic advantages of globalization and seek to maintain something of great value—language, tradition and custom. This is the relatively response. The other has become only too familiar: the violent reaction, the hatred of both economic and cultural globalization which may not merely perceive, but feel in the very core of their cognition, as an inseparable violation of identity. The resentment of many Muslims toward the U.S and Israel, the defensiveposturing of Vindu fundamentalism, opposed both to Islam and Christianity, are the most vivid dramatizationsof this.