范文1
论检察机关提起公诉的证明标准
广西玉林商校学习中心 农丽莉 学号:NO203010408008
内容提要:我国刑事诉讼法关于证据的规定比较简单,提起公诉的证明标准与法院判决的定罪标准在表述上几乎一致,证明标准均是“事实清楚,证据确实、充分”,即检察机关掌握的证明标准与法院判决掌握的标准同一,且规定得比较抽象、概括,在司法实践中比较难以把握和操作。由于检察机关提起公诉的证明标准过高,且标准单一,从而导致司法实践中检察机关控制和追诉某些犯罪超出了所能。本文通过评析检察机关提起公诉的证明标准,并与国外相关做法相比较,认为提起公诉的证明标准应区别于法院判决的证明标准。根据司法实践经验及借鉴国外相关经验,检察机关提起公诉的证明标准应确定为:提起公诉的证明标准应低于定罪量刑的标准,且不再应以客观真实为标准,以确保准确有效地执行法律。
关键词:刑事诉讼;检察机关;提起公诉;证明标准
Abstract: The our country code of criminal court provision concerning proof is more simple, the
proof standard that indict is in accordance with the court judicatory sentence the standard at the watch said the top almost, proof standard all is standard that proof standard that“ fact clarity, proof assuredness, well”, namely the organization of police control sentence with court to control same, and provision comparison abstract, generalize, in judicatory practice hard confidence with operate. Because the proof standard that the organization of police indict over high, and standard one, from but cause the judicatory practice the inside police organization control with pursue for some crime beyond the reach of can. This text passes the proof standard that critique police organization indict, and compare with related way of doing in abroad than, think that the proof standard that indict should discriminate between the proof standard of the court verdict. Practice the experience and draw lessons from the related experience in abroad according to the judicatory, the proof standard that the organization of police indict should make sure for: The proof standard of
…… …… 余下全文