无人生还读后感
It is said that the committing crime is the nature and original desire of human being. In my opinion, then there were none is the most blood-curdling and creeping one of all the creations of Christie. The story makes people with your hair standing on end and marvel at the crime?s delicateness. The story goes on with the way that Christie is most good at, a group of people was stuck in a place that nobody can come in and nobody can go out, while the murderer is one of them. People die one by one, and the feeling ?you?re next to go? and the fear is like a shadow surrounded tightly. All the things that one can do is to guess, suppose and curse. Every collaboration and cooperation with the other people is full of suspicion and mistrust. The human nature totally came out when someone is confronted with desperation and death. In the book, you can even not tell who is controlling the whole story and what effects the tone, the voice or the language. The author put the thoughts of the characters in there, without telling you whose thoughts they were. I think Justice Wargrave was telling the story, but it is just my idea. Christie never showed that. It just make you to guess. Like the characters in the story.
The motive of the murder depended on the characters and their personalities. Everyone seems to have his own motive and they are different from each other. But the only similar thing is the willingness to give justice to the murders of innocent people. And If I had to find a common thread of “motive”, I would say that selfishness would probably be number one. Vera killed the child out of selfishness, General MacArthur- selfishness, even Dr. Armstrong?s drinking and Anthony?s driving over the children were different forms of selfishness and not being focused on the needs of others.
Pretty much all the characters acted rather calm throughout the whole thing. I can?t imagine what I will do if I were in that situation, I would panic, cry, and find a trustworthy person and stick with them the whole time.
However, in the book, The effect of guilt emerges as one of the major underlying themes. Christie accurately portrayed the different human responses which shoes Guilt is most often what brings a person to repentance.
After reading, I wonder whether the people have got what they deserved, any of the characters were punished unfairly? Does “just behavior” mean that you are a “good” person? Warfield punishing the others for their prior actions but we can?t telling if he was right or not. In trying to create “justice” he himself became a murderer and unfortunately, nobody could help him.
In Christie?s autobiography, she wrote, “It was so difficult to do that the idea had fascinated me…I wrote the book after a tremendous amount of planning, and I was pleased with what I had made of it.” It was seemed to be an near-impossible story, but Christie made it come true.
第二篇：无人生还-读后感
读《无人生还》有感
以前一直很喜欢读关于推理类的小说，因为这很惊险，很刺激，能带给人新鲜的感觉，喜欢有惊喜，喜欢有期待的感觉。随着一层层薄纱被揭开，随着一层层迷雾被推开，呈现在我们面前的往往是意想不到的结果，喜出望外的感觉总是让人舒服，又惊奇。每次读一本推理小说，总是会受益匪浅，越看越喜欢。
荒岛上仅有十个人，其中有一个是凶手。但他们接连死去，无人生还。那么谁是杀人犯？是最后一个死去的人吗？如果不是，那么他（她）如何在死去之后，还能使自己的杀人计划照常实行？他（她）为什么杀人，又为什么给自己也贴上死亡标签？在《无人生还》中，阿加莎·克里斯蒂显然把自己逼入了创作的险地。面临此景，侦探小说作者有两种选择，一是用天才的构思自圆其说，另一就是假托“心理悬疑”“奇幻”一类低劣手段胡说八道。 “十个小兵人，外出去吃饭。一个被呛死，还剩九个人。九个小兵人，熬夜熬得深。一个睡过头，还剩八个人。八个小兵人，动身去德文。一个要留下，还剩七个人??”这首英国的古老童谣成了贯穿小说的线索。十个被害者先后像歌谣中描述的那样死去，使之带有谶语的色彩。它使这小说的文字冷飕飕的。你的耳旁似乎总有一个呓语式的童声，它在轻轻吟咏这歌谣，那漫不经心的声调中带着一丝死亡的气息，犹如在童真的面庞上忽然出现嗜血的表情一般，让人在极端的对比中感到无形的恐惧。
从风和日丽到惨雾弥漫，小岛由度假胜地变成了人间地狱。这部英国的小说，会很容易地让你联想起英国的天气：多雨、阴冷。暗夜中的大海隐去了波澜壮阔的一面，冷峻地窥视岛上的一切。当海边也成为谋杀现场之一时，从沙滩上退去的海浪便留下一抹忧郁，让人担忧死亡之吻的再度来临。尼罗河上的扑朔迷离，扰乱的是读者的智慧，而《无人生还》中的大惑不解，扰乱的是人们的心弦。
克里斯蒂似乎是深信人性本恶的。在谋杀案中，几乎每位出现在现场的人都有作案动机。克里斯蒂在对每一位嫌疑人加以排除时，都顺便嘲讽着他们的阴暗一面。凶手预先在留声机中放置了录音，在众人上岛后逐个宣布了他们的罪状。原来每位上岛者的心头都藏有一个秘密：军官为了泄私愤故意将下属派往危险之地；医生醉酒后动手术致使病人死亡；女孩儿为了帮情人获得遗产故意制造了一起事故??所有的人都受到了指控，小岛变成了审判之所。
在绝境中，有人心头坦然，因其多年来已无法承受罪恶感带来的痛苦；有人不以为然，因其从不曾以自己的罪错为忤；还有人惶然，有人凄然。但无论怎样，从贵族到底层，岛上的所有人都揭去了身份的装扮，在最残酷的现实面前表露了最真实的一面。渴望生命是其中一部分人的想法，渴望解脱则是所有人的企盼——困境或道德上的解脱。
如果说“波洛三部曲”里还有波洛的幽默作为调剂，那么《无人生还》则从头至尾充满压抑的悲腔。克里斯蒂的嘲弄越来越少，取而代之的是声色俱厉的批判。同时她也变得更无情——那首童谣无异于一份判决书，将这些待死的囚徒送至刑场，先让他们看到黑洞洞的枪口，而后蒙上头罩，再将枪口抵上他们的额头。那种等待中的煎熬带来了无法承受的沉重感。也许，当你在深夜读这本书时，会听见他们大口的喘息声。
“他们究竟是谁杀的呢？”直到小说临近终结，这谜团一直困扰众人。最后是一份神秘的自白解开了谜。真正令人吃惊的，不是行凶者那难以为人察觉的作案手段，而是他（她）的身份和动机。人性的悲哀在最后的剖白中无法抑止，海中的荒岛犹如失落的人心，在罪错的反思中变得无所凭依。文明在小岛上荒芜，道德的流放地万物萧条，无人生还。这部小说在此时变得深刻起来，当后世的读者一再感叹克里斯蒂“目眩神迷”的写作技巧时，似不应忽略她笔下流露的哀叹之声。