编辑 | 删除 | 复制链接

life is beyond me 2010-12-05 18:53 (分类:默认分类) I have never wroten journal in english so i want to have a try this time. just the other day a confusing problem encountered me. in a dellima,it grieved me ang drove me into gloomy.fortunately,utimately,after having balanced all the aspects,i made it with strong ambition.

Sometimes, i feel so wierd and awful. everything arounds me wears veils and seems virtual and light,as light as wind.it can`t be described by words.maybe now i am absorbed in delight ang jubliance,the next second is on the opposite. Life isn`t here, my myself can`t find it.how wretched is the feeling.being a person of keen perception is not as good as imaging in mind.most time it is such a kind of work:exhausting your body all the time occuping your brian all the time.certianly it can also brings you to paradise with it`s magic power.

Although life is not always smooth and full of satisfaction .what you need to do is to be yourself,never mind what people say.it`s none of your business.only direct yourself to the right direction you`ve been chasing all the time,can you taste the flavor of life.sweet or bitter?the answer is

wating for you to despose.when you feel blue,up your head , nothing or

nobody can take the sky that belonds to you away.it is just there.yes !!!it is just there if ony you live!

第二篇：LEARNING STYLES

LEARNING STYLES

Students preferentially take in and process information in different ways: by seeing and hearing, reflecting and acting, reasoning logically and intuitively, analyzing and visualizing, steadily and in fits and starts. Teaching methods also vary. Some instructors lecture, others demonstrate or lead students to self-discovery; some focus on principles and others on applications; some emphasize memory and others understanding.

When mismatches exist between learning styles of most students in a class and the teaching style of the professor, the students may become bored and inattentive in class, do poorly on tests, get discouraged about the courses, the curriculum, and themselves, and in some cases change to other curricula or drop out of school. Professors, confronted by low test grades, unresponsive or hostile classes, poor attendance and dropouts, know something is not working. They may become overly critical of their students (making things even worse) or begin to wonder if they are in the right profession. Most seriously, society loses potentially excellent professionals. To overcome these problems, professors should strive for a balance of instructional methods (as opposed to trying to teach each student exclusively according to his or her preferences.) If the balance is achieved, all students will be taught partly in a manner they prefer, which leads to an increased comfort level and willingness to learn, and partly in a less preferred manner, which provides practice and feedback in ways of thinking and solving problems which they may not initially be comfortable with but which they will have to use to be fully effective professionals.

This site contains resources for a model of learning styles generally referred to as the Felder-Silverman model. The model was originally formulated by Dr. Felder in collaboration with Dr. Linda K. Silverman, an educational psychologist, for use by college instructors and students in engineering and the sciences, although it has subsequently been applied in a broad range of disciplines.

Video of an interview with Richard Felder Introduction to Learning Styles, a taped interview at California State University at Dominguez Hills.

Assessment of learning style preferences

The Index of Learning Styles is a self-scoring questionnaire for assessing preferences on four dimensions of the Felder-Silverman model. Descriptions of learning styles. A four-page handout that briefly explains the learning style preferences obtained using the Index of Learning Styles.

Publications related to the Felder-Silverman Learning Style Model

1. R.M. Felder and L.K. Silverman, "Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education," Engr. Education, 78(7), 674-681 (1988). The article that originally defined the Felder-Silverman model and identified teaching practices that should meet the needs of

students with the full spectrum of styles. The paper is preceded by a 2002 preface that states and explains changes in the model that have been made since 1988.

2. R.M. Felder, "Reaching the Second Tier: Learning and Teaching Styles in College Science Education," J. College Science Teaching, 23(5), 286-290 (1993). An updated presentation of the

Felder-Silverman model.

3. R.M. Felder and E.R. Henriques, "Learning and Teaching Styles in Foreign and Second Language Education," Foreign Language Annals, 28(1), 21-31 (1995). Application of the F-S learning style model to language education.

4. R.M. Felder and J.E. Spurlin, "Applications, Reliability, and Validity of the Index of Learning Styles." Intl. Journal of

Engineering Education, 21(1), 103-112 (2005). A validation study of the Index of Learning Styles.

5. T.A. Litzinger, S.H. Lee, J.C. Wise, and R.M. Felder, "A Psychometric Study of the Index of Learning Styles." J. Engr. Education, 96(4), 309-319 (2007). Reliability, factor structure, and construct validity of the Index of Learning Styles.

Publications related to learning styles in general and other learning style models

1. R.M. Felder and R. Brent, "Understanding Student Differences." J. Engr. Education, 94(1), 57-72 (2005). An exploration of differences in student learning styles, approaches to learning (deep, surface, and strategic), and levels of intellectual development, with recommended teaching practices to address all three categories.

2. R.M. Felder, "Matters of Style." ASEE Prism, 6(4), 18-23 (December 1996). Principles and applications of four learning style models (Felder-Silverman, Kolb, and models based on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the Herrmann Brain Dominance Instrument). The paper concludes that the choice of a model is almost irrelevant: teaching designed to address all dimensions on any of the models is likely to be effective, and all of the models lead to more or less the same instructional approach.

3. R.M. Felder, "Are Learning Styles Invalid? (Hint: No!)." On-Course Newsletter, September 27, 2010. A response to claims that no evidence justifies taking learning styles into account when designing instruction.

4. R.M. Felder, G.N. Felder, and E.J. Dietz, "The Effects of Personality Type on Engineering Student Performance and Attitudes." J. Engr. Education, 91(1), 3-17 (2002). The

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator was administered to 116 sophomore engineering students, whose progress through the curriculum for the next two years was monitored. Type differences in various academic performance measures and attitudes were generally consistent with the predictions of type theory. Active and cooperative learning improves the performance of MBTI types (extraverts, sensors, and feelers) found in previous studies to be disadvantaged in the engineering curriculum.

5. R.M. Felder, "A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention. IV. Instructional Methods and Student Responses to Them." J. Engr. Education, 84(4), 361-367 (1995). Instructional methods designed to reach the full spectrum of learning styles, as applied in an ongoing longitudinal study of engineering students.

6. R.M. Felder, G.N. Felder, and E.J. Dietz, "A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention. V. Comparisons with Traditionally-Taught Students." J. Engr. Education, 87(4), 469-480 (1998). Performance and attitude differences between students taught with an active/cooperative learning model and students taught with a traditional instructor-centered model.

The subsequent references focus on individual dimensions of student differences.

7. R.M. Felder, "Meet Your Students: 1. Stan and Nathan." Chem. Engr. Education, 23(2), 68-69 (Spring 1989). The sensing learning and the intuitive learner.

8. R.M. Felder, "Meet Your Students: 2. Susan and Glenda." Chem. Engr. Education, 24(1), 7-8 (Winter 1990). The sequential learner and the global learner.

9. R.M. Felder, "Meet Your Students: 3. Michelle, Rob, and Art." Chem. Engr. Education, 24(3), 130-131 (Summer 1990). Three different approaches to learning (deep, surface, and strategic), and the conditions that induce students to take a deep approach.

10.R.M. Felder, "Meet Your Students: 4. Jill and Perry." Chem. Engr. Education, 25(4), 196-197 (Fall 1991). The judger and the perceiver on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.

11.R.M. Felder, "Meet Your Students: 5. Edward and Irving." Chem. Engr. Education, 28(1), 36-37 (Winter 1994). The extravert and the introvert on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, and to a good

approximation, the active learner and reflective learner on the Index of Learning Styles.

12.R.M. Felder, "Meet Your Students: 6. Tony and Frank." Chem. Engr. Education, 29(4), 244-245 (Fall 1995). The thinker and the feeler on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.

Send email to Richard Felder at rmfelder@mindspring.com Return to Dr. Felder's home page