原文:/moretoefl/toeflxz/fanwen/zonghe/201407/8090876.html?tg=14
托福综合写作范文举例:网络故事书
网络故事书(web-storybook service)
reading
网络故事书的好处:
1.可以教小朋友读书
2.经济实惠,家长不需要为孩子买书了
3.可以代替父母陪伴孩子,为家长节省时间
lecture
反驳:
1.使用时不能和小朋友互动(ask question and get feedback)
2.网络上的故事都是过时的,要想读新故事还是要买书(不足)
3.父母与孩子一起读书可以增进感情
例文:
The speaker rebuts the reading's argument by pointing out the inadequacy of the web-storybook services' interaction with children, the incompleteness of the data pool, and by undermining the assumption that saving parents' reading time is a benefit.
The speaker begins by stating that merely pronouncing the words and story for the children will not provide adequate learning experiences. Despite the time saved and pronunciation utilities laid out in the reading, the web services can only respond with "correct" or "not correct". The lack of feedback to children's questions will not create an effective learning process.
Then the speaker goes on to argue that the current web-storybook services have a very limited collection of books, thus not being able to save parents the cost of new books as the reading states, because the parents still have to buy many books that the web services do not provide.
Lastly, the speaker challenges the validity of the assumption of saving parents' time to read stories to children. The reading argues that saving the time is a benefit for the parents, but the speaker maintains that the whole point of reading stori
原文:/moretoefl/toeflxz/fanwen/zonghe/201407/8090876.html?tg=14 es is far beyond reading stories alone. In contrast, it is an essential way of communicating and building relationship between parents and children.
第二篇:托福第一篇写作范文
In terms of whether Rembrandt painted Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet, the reading and listening are contradictory to each other. First, the writer makes the point that the fur collar the woman is wearing is not consistent with her identity. However, the professor demonstrates a different idea that the fur collar was not part of the original painting and it was painted a hundred years after the painting was made.
Second, contrary to the belief in the reading passage that light and shadow in the painting are inconsistent, the lecturer says that the woman was actually wearing a light colored cloth in the original painting, which reflects the light to illuminate the woman’s face.
Finally, the author states that Rembrandt should not have painted on a panel made of several pieces of wood. In contrast, the professor refutes that the original painting was enlarged to be more grand and valuable. In fact, it was painted on a single piece of wood from the same tree with another painting by Rembrandt.