领导者
70"In any profession—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years. The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership." Position: Limiting the term of leadership is an effective way to prevent corruption and lack of initiatives.
A. When leaders have no fear of losing their power, they tend to abuse their power.
B. A new leadership usually has greater initiative and would bring in new ideas.
C. However, in private areas such as business it might not be so necessary to limit the term of leadership.
1.though creativity is emphasized ubiquitously in study, business, research, and thought, we should adopt is selectively.
2.new things always have many rejections in its application, and is not always on the right track. In the transformation of the leadership, efficiency of the enterprises will surely deteriorate and profit will decrease. It is a big challenge for any enterprises. In case the transform fails, it is disastrous to the enterprise.
3.if such trend permeate in the society, there are bound to be irretrievable loss and destruction.
4.we should adopt the creativity selectively, tailoring it to our flavor and condition.
Position: The surest way to success for all enterprises should be anaylized respectively instead of just considering the revitalization of leadership as the only channel.
1, Leaders in power in various fields have their strongs and wesknesses. Those who accumulate experience and prosper and even gain public suppot or those who benefit the society in their utmost, deserve respect and promotion.
2, The success of an enterprise is decided by many factors such as economical environment, political stability and international relationships.
3, Although an revitalization of leadership does bring some benefits , it is only one , not necessarily right , channel.
4, From a broad point of view, we can reasonably plan for the future and success of an enterprise.
(1)to great existence, if one cannot see the concrete example that the aging and ossifying leadship will undermine the profession patently and greatly, one can deduce i t from the general principle. for example. so some thing shoule be done, some rule institute, some example set.
(2)but new leadship not mean to permute the preceding wholely, beside supplant the original one there are still divergent approach to attain such goal,such as . on the other hand, why it must 5 years that the origin one have to step down? longer or shorter? how about 8 or 10
(3) and remaim the preceding leadship can conserve the stable in the main policy and the sequence. it will disturb the proper rhymer, and it would demand more or less quite a long time to put all the worlk in the right place.
(4)according all the outline it is immeience to remedy and prevent the leadship ossify and age, but we can adop a more moderate way.
Position:
1. Those in power for several years are generally old and their physical conditions become worse and worse. It's unwise to be still in power if they are likely less capable to deal with mass of matters.
2. Another problem also should be considered: young and talent people who are excellent enough to fit the position don't have the opportunities to make achievements if the old are still rooted.
3. However, power men have much more experience than those young. They often represent their surprisingly wise and diplomatic capabilities when dealing with tough problems, which rare happens on young men.
4. The credit, repute and public support are also considerable factors. New leadership are less experienced and need a comparative long period to be adapted to the society.
1. beginning
2.1 a person in a position too long will either get tired of his work, or make misdeed. Need new one bring vigor into the profession. absolute power leads to absolute depravation
2.2 give change to those who are more compatible for the job.
2.3 period for tenure of the office should take discretion.
3. to get a better result, it is better to let leaders abdicate.
Protean as the world represents and situation changes continuously, after a relative stable period, leaders should abdicate and new one is required to supple the vacant position.
Protean as the world represents and situation changes continuously, after a relative stable period, leaders should abdicate and new one is required to supple the vacant position.
When one is appointed to a new department, ambitious and aggressive as he/she is, the ardour fills in heart of the one’s, earnest he/she will be and the spirit will infect others. Thus, a benign vogue is formed which boost the group to go in an exiting cycle. With the zeal vanishing, as the leader is too familiar with his/her work and with the different types relationship built, it is hard to keep disinterest for the leader. Inevitable, discontent will come out and internal contradictory will emerge thus efficiency will descend. The result what I have stated is just refer to those who are decent, for leaders
who can’t deny snare situation will be more serious. A famous aphorism that absolute power leads to absolute depravation repeals shortness of leaders staying long in a profession from this aspect.
Meanwhile, even the leader keeps rectitude and he/she was competent with his occupation, however, if the leader stays in the profession infinitely, other one who in the beginning years was not as excellent as the leader, in the later years has been keeping on trying and now is more suitable for the position has no chance to be promote. It is not equal for the more diligent person and also contradicts Market economic laws which require optimize allocation of resource, including labor resource. In the antithesis, if the leader can assume more important assignment, and if he/she is confined in the limited circle, also it is a waste of gifts of the leader and it is unfair for him/her.
To reach the most effective for all the member of society and make full use of resource, leaders should abdicate when expiration of his/her term in office falls according to relevant laws that corresponding economic rules. Length of the period for the leader in the position should be decided in concrete circumstance, arbitrarily circumscribe it to 5 years will court trouble in the later years, some such as manager of a small company should be substituted in less than 5 years while the presidential election should be hold 4 years a time at least to ensure stability of the country.
Definitely, system of leader replacement should be built and advantages of it are obvious. Only through this form, can all people enjoy equal citizen right and the society can create the most value. Thus, keeping on executing this policy in any profession—business, politics, education, government—is impeachable and rational.