TPO16

The professor states that the science of archaeology – dedicated to uncovering and studying old cultural artifacts – was faced with serious problems and limitations in Britain.But the lecture express that all the serous problems could be solved by the new rules and the new guidelines.

First,the professor state that many valuable artifacts were lost to construction projects.While digging foundations for new buildings, the builders often uncovered archaeologically valuable sites.Many archaeologically precious artifacts were therefore destroyed.Then the lecture express that the new guidelines state that before any construction project can start, the construction site has to be examined by archaeologists to see whether the site is of archaeological interest or value.

Second,the professor state many archaeologists felt that the financial support for archaeological research are inadequate.Then the lecture express that any archaeological work done on the construction site will be paid for by the construction company not by the government.

…… …… 余下全文

The professor explained three aspects of the new guidelines adopted in the United Kingdom, each of which has successfully addressed the problems mentioned in the reading passage concerning the preservation of the artifacts, the funding of archaeological research, and the career opportunities in archaeology.

First and the foremost, the professor pointed out that according to the new guidelines, any construction project must be examined carefully in order for the archaeological value of the site. If the site contains precious objects, a preservation plan will be made by the expert and the local official to project the construction. This measure has been proved very effective in addressing the first problem mentioned in the reading that carless project destroyed many precious artifacts.

In addition, the lecturer explained that the new guidelines shifted the responsibility for the funding archaeological work, from the government to the construction company. What's more, the funding will support the whole process of the project, and the archeologists were allowed to make the research. As a result of this shift, the second problem highlighted in the reading concerning the inadequate financial support has been solved.

…… …… 余下全文

As stated in the reading, there are varied serious problems and limitation for archaeologist to study old cultural artifacts in Britain. Yet a professor argues that with the new guideline of the government towards archaeology in three points.

To begin with, the professor contend that the government proceeded with the construction at the same time they did not pay attention to the artifacts mentioned in the reading, is not the truth, he explains, the new guideline asks the local administrators and the archaeologist together to do a construction examine come up with a plan about how to preserve the artifacts before proceed the construction.

In addition, the speaker argue with that there is not enough financial support towards the protect project by saying that the new guideline require the construction company instead of the government to offer the subsides. This financing could be enough for the site research and artifacts preserving.

…… …… 余下全文

TPO 16综合写作

Generally, contrary to the belief in the reading that in British around the twentieth century, there are a lot dilemma for the archaeology, the professor asserts that all the three limitations and problems states by the reading below are in fact improve by the government. The professor completely refutes the viewpoint made in the reading passage.

First of all, the writer presents an idea that many valuable artifacts were lost to construction projects .In contrast, the professor argues the artifacts are examined by the archaeology then document if it is worthwhile. In order to prove his point, she states that the government has made the rule that before constructing started, it is supposed to examine by the archeology whether the constructions were valuable and interesting. This is just contrary to the belief in the reading.

…… …… 余下全文

In terms whether the zebra mussel will exert negative influence on North American, the passage and lecture are contradictory to each other. The author believes that zebra mussel might do harm the local species as they arrived while the lecturer holds a different opinion.

First of all, the author makes a point that the history events suggest the zebra mussel's invasion is unstoppable. In the past, human transportation makes it possible for zebra mussel spread around the whole Europe and it is likely to happen again in North American. However, the lecturer demonstrates a different idea that a change made in the "ballast water" will prevent the invasion of zebra mussel from continuing. He says that if we refill the "ballast water" with ocean water, the mussel will no longer survive because the saline water might probably kill them all.

…… …… 余下全文

综合写作 tpo29 范文

In the reading, it mainly talks about that the edmontosautus in order to survive would migrate south to more suitable place. Nonetheless, in the lecture, the professor thinks the arguments provided in the reading are not convincing.

First of all, the reading mentions that the edmontosaur’s diet support the migrating idea because in the winter, the cold weather prevent plnats from surviving in the north. Nevertheless, the professor concludes that there is no relation between the magration and food supply by giving the fact that long ago the weather in summer was warmer than today’s and even if at the approach of the winter, there did existed enough nurients to feed animals like edmontosauts.

Additonally, the reading states that the many edmontosaur skeletons have been unreathed in the same site which means that the edmontosaur were in herd and there are some similarities bewteen the edmonsaurs and modern migrating animals that find food by migrating. On the contrary, the professor claims that though the enmonsaurs can live in herd, the propose of living in herd is not migrating but aginasting the predators.

…… …… 余下全文

The passage claims that wood companies in US would probably not receive ecocertification as companies in other countries do. While, in the lecture, the professor points out several points to substantiate that American wood companies would be most likely to advertising their products by pursuing ecocertification.

First of all, the professor claims that consumers in American pay less attention to advertising and, in fact, they value the advertising which independent from companies, like Consumer Agency. Certainly, consumers in America would like their products to become more environmentally-friendly. Therefore, wood companies in US would want to receive this ecocertification to gain reputation. That differs from what the passage states that consumers would not value the eco-healthy label as much as these labels 'new' or 'improved'.

…… …… 余下全文