The evidence that lines in the Sinosauropteryx fossils represent feathers is very strong. The arguments of the critics are unconvincing.
First, it is unlikely that the lines are a result of the decomposition of the dinosaur’s skin, because we do not see any such decomposition in the fossils of other animals buried at the same site. In fact, the fossils of many other animals buried at the site show evidence that their functional skin structures have been beautiful preserved in volcanic ash. The well preserved condition of the other fossils makes it likely that Sinosauropteryx lines are also well preserved function structures, possibly feathers. And they are not fibers caused by decomposition.
Second, the idea that the lines of Sinosauropteryx represent frills, well, there is an
important chemical difference between feathers and frills. Feathers contain a great deal of protein called beta-keratin. Frills, on the other hand, do not contain beta-keratin. Our chemical analysis suggests Sinosauropteryx structures did contain beta-keratin. So that indicates that structures were feathers, not frills.
…… …… 余下全文